He’s a relatively dense, convoluted read, as are many of the intellectuals of his ilk. But he’s considered the founder of cultural Marxism.
He’s a relatively dense, convoluted read, as are many of the intellectuals of his ilk. But he’s considered the founder of cultural Marxism.
He’s the big wheel in how the Marxist thinks.
He’s the “take over the institutions” dude. Back in the 90’s I tried to pursue a Masters in Communications at Hunter College in NYC. His book was on the prof’s reading list. Left the program at the end of the first class.