Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Adder
It was discussed and rejected at the time.

If you read the Surrender Document and the Parole Document neither specifically protects the rebel soldiers from treason charges after the rebellion. But Grant did believe that such protections were implied and he was willing to go to the mat to protect Lee and others. It was a most honorable position to take, and Johnson eventually came around to that way of thinking when he issued his amnesty proclamations.

16 posted on 07/22/2020 4:09:08 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
If you read about the attempts to prosecute Jefferson Davis, you will know very well why no charges of "Treason" were attempted.

As Chief Justice Salmon P Chase remarked to Federal prosecutors, (paraphrased) "If you try Davis for Treason, you will lose everything in court you've won on the battlefield, for Secession isn't treason."

I'm not going to look up his exact words. You could find it if you wanted too. I expect you will now quote to me what Chase said later.

590 posted on 11/06/2020 2:52:22 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson