[vikingd00d]

>>Most of them seem to be within the margin of error so it’s not disastrous as the media would have you believe...

Yes, but how much did they oversample the Rats? 8 points? 10 points? Without knowing that these numbers are meaningless

[cgbg]

how much did they oversample the Rats? 8 points? 10 points

Oops--caught us red handed.

How did you know that?

You must be one of those dangerous Russian hackers destroying the integrity of our electoral process!

;-)

[RandFan]

I have no idea viking... there isn’t a link to the data.

Not all of them release the samples (I wonder why...)

[Tonytitan]

...did they oversample the Rats?... Without knowing that these numbers are meaningless

These numbers are meaningless anyway. They still have no way to correctly ascertain the size of Trump's largest voting block - non-college educated white men. They don't respond to pollsters because they're too busy working for a living. And chances are they are even more numerous than in 2016. And if Rasmussen's polling is accurate, 4 in 10 African American likely voters approve of the job that Trump is doing. Those two realities by themselves means that Donald Trump steps on Joe Biden's face on 11-3.

[Jane Long]

That’s what I’ve heard/read that they’re doing....sampling Dems +10.