Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brown Deer

She was an anchor baby. The question is, can an anchor baby be president?


2 posted on 08/12/2020 8:36:34 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf

Nobody cares.

The “Constitution” is dead and irrelevant.

Now, we’re just making it up as we go along.

The Elites want Harris and the Elites got Harris.

That’s all there is to it.

“Democracy” and “voting” and the “Constition” are shams.


14 posted on 08/12/2020 8:43:27 AM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

“The question is, can an anchor baby be president?“

If Bezos, the Tech Giants and China want her to be president, then she can be president.

230 year old piece of paper ain’t going to change that in a society in full collapse. The only thing that can change that is men under arms.


23 posted on 08/12/2020 8:48:23 AM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast (Make Orwell Fiction Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

Barry Soetoro was allowed to be president so KH should have no problem unless the idea was to get Pelosi as the Dems next Prezzy because Joe will never make it 4 years in office.


39 posted on 08/12/2020 9:03:43 AM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

Not when parent(s) are citizens of foreign powers , no


46 posted on 08/12/2020 9:10:35 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (Politicians are not born, theyÂ’re excreted. Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf; All
So-called “anchor baby citizenship” is unconstitutional imo.

Consider the citizenship definition of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment. Although that definition applies to natural born citizens, the purpose of that section is to define citizenship requirements for non-natural born citizens.

”14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

In order to be born a US citizen, you not only need to be born on US-controlled soil, but you also have to be subject to the jurisdiction thereof. And to satisfy being subject to the jurisdiction thereof, at least one of your parents has to be a US citizen.

The reason that we have so-called anchor babies is this imo. Since bona-fide citizens don’t want to vote for flunky, bully, desperate Democrats, Democrats struggle to stay in power partly by promising welfare for illegal aliens if illegals use their anchor baby status to vote for Democrats.

Also consider that decades of Democrats winning elections by unthinkingly promoting the murder of unborn Democrats has caught up with Democrats.

Corrections, insights welcome.

50 posted on 08/12/2020 9:22:54 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson