Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MulberryDraw

Yup...It should be malpractice not to check a patient’s Vit d3 levels, and then get them up to 60-80 if they are deficient...cheap and could solve lots of health problems.


14 posted on 08/14/2020 9:14:48 PM PDT by goodnesswins (The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution." -- Saul Alinksy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: goodnesswins

Checking levels is very expensive plus it is hard to make a clear cut diagnosis that makes insurance companies agree that it was medically necessary to check a level. Patients should start taking a good amount of D3 first for a good amount of time and THEN have a level checked. 5000 IU daily for 3 months first, then check. One time might be enough then, you might be on the right dose at that point. It is actually a total waste of money how many vitamin D levels are being checked now, especially if you already know it is going to me low. Spend money on something else.


17 posted on 08/14/2020 9:45:26 PM PDT by Weirdad (Orthodox Americanism: It's what's good for the world! (Not communofascism!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson