[SunkenCiv]

“Of course that’s election interference,” said social media researcher and psychologist Dr. Robert Epstein. The former editor of Psychology Today also argued to the Media Research Center that this kind of censorship “could be considered a valuable, undeclared, in-kind contribution to a political campaign, which is unlawful.”

[WoofDog123]

none of it matters, though.
if biden wins or otherwise matters are snarled up sufficiently, nothing will be done and it was worth it.
if trump wins, they can hope to snarl things up another 4 years, as clearly the bureaucracy isn’t behind the administration on this.

[Pajamajan]

that this kind of censorship “could be considered a valuable, undeclared, in-kind contribution to a political campaign, which is unlawful.”

BUMP

[Jim W N]

To the extent it is private enterprise doing it, their bias not illegal election interference. It is constitutionally protected free political speech.

Patriots, go out and make our own biased political speech. We have every right to.