Posted on 08/23/2020 8:42:05 PM PDT by AndyJackson
Smile...
Total agreement. Miracle required?
You had me at hello.
OK—Looks like it will work. BUT nothing on infrastructure and bridges? Railroads and shipping? Mostly things that can be done —no pie in the sky junk Like Clean energy by 2034 or all electric cars by 2044. Mars thing looks kinda hard—But a Base on Moon for Spaceforce sounds good.
Thanks...
See Hugh Hewitt echos this:
The Republican convention may be virtual, but there are real reasons to celebrate four years of Trump
Falls under "Build the World's Greatest Infrastructure" -- second item under "Innovate for the Future".
I also notice there's nothing in there about building more border wall -- will that project be completed this year?
Get rid of LOBBYISTS!!
Meaningful, measurable and achievable.
So glad the Democrats went first. Had Trump gone first, Biden would have touted many of Trump’s ideas and claimed they were his and Obama’s. Kneejerk Dems or independents who only watched the Democrat convention would have believed him.
I can’t count the number of times I’ve seen comments posted on mainstream sites that call Trump “lazy” and say he never does anything. It’s an astonishing level of willful ignorace.
Ping
ping
I agree. Succinct, direct and to the point.
Some things on here that will never actually happen (i.e. term limits) but are good for firing-up the base.
That whole Swamp Draining bit means he has to be prepared this time to carry out MASS FIRINGS on Jan. 21.
PASS CONGRESSIONAL TERM LIMITS!!! Oh, brother, that is going to drive the commies nuts. Some of them don’t have any other “experience” in doing anything, sit on their asses and take government money.
Nothing about the second amendment?
How about?
Finish the damn wall?
As long as the ACA allows subsidies to buy down the cost of insurance, there will be some kind of clawback.
If one gets a subsidy of 50% for the cost of insurance, and makes even $1 over the max income allowed per family size, then the entire subsidy must be paid back.
We can discuss whether a subsidy should be offered, especially in the current form, but this cliff rule just kills taxpayers since they never get good info from the ACA Navigators.
Please note that the ones most hurt are taxpayers over age 55, when the cost of insurance skyrockets. I have a couple of new tax clients that must pay back over $20,000 in subsidies. They “made too much money” since they pulled money out of retirement funds to pay for surgeries, had job buyouts/lump sum or started taking social security retirement early being unable to work due to health.
In the future they will have better advice, but this rule (among many others) just kills folks.
Bump
Bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.