Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SamAdams76
I'm not sold on the "take it early" argument. The difference is pretty significant. I'm on track to earn $3,007/mo if I can wait until FRA at 67 (just 9 years away). Taking it at 62 is $2,107/mo. Waiting until 70 gets me to almost $4,000/mo.

Much depends on how much you enjoy your job.

I had a good career, and overall felt productive.

As the bureaucracy aged, and became more burdensome, the job became less enjoyable.

I got out at 62 and started doing what I enjoyed and was passionate about.

I would not trade that time. It has been wonderful.

35 posted on 08/24/2020 6:01:52 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

There’s certainly a value in quality of life as well. If I did not like my job, taking Social Security earlier would be more of a choice. Currently I like my career and would like to stay in it so long as I stay healthy. But that could change rapidly. This year, with the pandemic, it remains to be seen how viable my industry will be over the next 10 years.


40 posted on 08/24/2020 6:11:23 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson