Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/26/2020 12:18:05 PM PDT by rintintin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: rintintin

Easy fix. Print some more money. Seems to be the answer for everything else.


2 posted on 08/26/2020 12:19:54 PM PDT by moovova (https://therealjoe.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

It’s in a LOCK BOX.


3 posted on 08/26/2020 12:20:32 PM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Then the elderly who can walk riot. Even in their wheelchairs if necessary.


4 posted on 08/26/2020 12:21:26 PM PDT by DownInFlames (Gals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Except it wouldn’t, cause it’s actually all the general fund, the whole separate balance for SocSec is a fiction.


5 posted on 08/26/2020 12:21:28 PM PDT by discostu (Like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

This is going to be the democrats new tactic over the next few weeks, the old tried and true “push granny over the cliff”. They already tried in once with the easily disproved lie that changes in mail service would prevent granny from getting her Social Security check (all SS payments have been direct deposit since 2013).


6 posted on 08/26/2020 12:21:35 PM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

How many times do the administration people have to say this: they want to defer the payroll tax and when they find a suitable replacement, forgive the tax that was deferred.


7 posted on 08/26/2020 12:21:51 PM PDT by Savage Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Did he actually propose scrapping it or just deferring it?


8 posted on 08/26/2020 12:22:31 PM PDT by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Social Security is a pay as you go cash-flow system, regardless of the accounting fiction of a trust fund.

Why? Because it holds no assets except IOUs from the government which has spent surplus funds.

Amazingly, before LBJ needed mucho money, Social Security actually held resalable financial assets (Top quality bonds). It was also much smaller.


9 posted on 08/26/2020 12:22:51 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Complete scare tactics nonsense...

Oh those mean Republicans, we told you they’d take your
Social Security!


10 posted on 08/26/2020 12:23:54 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Some of the folks around these parts have been sniffing super flu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Bull. When does welfare and food stamps run out of money?


11 posted on 08/26/2020 12:25:40 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

No delegated power for Social Security and an illegitimate promise should not be honored....


12 posted on 08/26/2020 12:25:43 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin
CONgress owes SS over $13T so just cash in the Congressional IOUs and refund SS.
14 posted on 08/26/2020 12:27:47 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

New sources of funding? There are plenty. Start with the $1.6 trillion that China has owed us since 1916 or so.


17 posted on 08/26/2020 12:32:19 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Caveat Emperor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

This is another damned Democrat lie. They scrap federal tax and leave fica and state tax in. Of corse they have to scare seniors by saying this will effect SS. It won’t.


20 posted on 08/26/2020 12:36:24 PM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Deep State strikes again.


21 posted on 08/26/2020 12:36:41 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Use the payroll of all those worthless overpaid freeloaders up on the hill. 535 members of the house and senate with their combined staff.

If President Trump can work for free, they can too.


23 posted on 08/26/2020 12:37:52 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (Political Science degrees, so easy Obama has one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

“Repealing the payroll tax as proposed by President Donald Trump without putting in place a new source of funding for Social Security would mean disability payments would end in mid-2021 and payments to the elderly would stop in 2023, according to the program’s chief actuary.”

Why is the payroll tax being included in the social security tax. Two separate taxes which should never touch each other. Wasn’t that the reason for the “lock box?”


28 posted on 08/26/2020 12:48:10 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Cloward-Piven is finally upon us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Dig up LBJ so he can explain to you why SS is an obligation of the General Fund.


31 posted on 08/26/2020 12:51:48 PM PDT by jdsteel (Americans are Dreamers too!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin

Pulling the ole carrot and stick ruse again I see.

When a simple flat tax would solve all the problems and stop with the rich vs poor bullshit.


42 posted on 08/26/2020 1:22:21 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin
Everyone has some correct comments, and some incorrect comments. I think the confusion was deliberately cause by the Democraps.

Social Secure did and always has come from the general fund. There was a movement in the 1980’s, somewhat led by Al Bore, to ‘save’ Social Security by greatly increasing the amount and the amount you were taxed on. Bore insisted that the extra money would be put into a “lock box” for when it was needed. When the fool was running for President he droned on and on that this was true.

What he apparently could not grasp is that one of the biggest thieves to ever infest congress, Robert Byrd, had changed the wording of the bill. The money went into the hands of Congress to continue squander-mania, and Congress just put IOUs into the so called lock-box. So basically there is no lock-box for any part of Social Security - just empty promises!

45 posted on 08/26/2020 1:47:35 PM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson