Um,... yeah. Thought that was obvious.
A study published last week out of Saudi Arabia found that “Early intervention with HCQ-based therapy in patients with mild to moderate symptoms at presentation is associated with lower adverse clinical outcomes among COVID-19 patients, including hospital admissions, ICU admission, and/or death.”
Another study published earlier this month of nursing home patients found that patients not treated with hydroxychloroquine found that those receiving standard treatment had a mortality rate more than five times higher than those who were treated with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.
In July, a large-scale, peer-reviewed study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System concluded that hydroxychloroquine successfully lowered mortality rates for hospitalized coronavirus patients.
There are currently about a hundred studies on the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in treating COVID-19 (61 of them peer-reviewed) that overwhelmingly show positive results, particularly when administered early.
Yet, according to the CDC, “the potential benefits of [hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine] do not outweigh their risks.”
Yeah, okay.
Yes. Next question.
B) Which diseases have they prevented or eradicated?
Is this article from May? /s
Is a hog’s posterior pork?
partly
but the real reason is fauci is tied to soros and gates who are tied to vaccines and alternate drugs for this
if hcq were recognized as being effective against hcq, all the other drugs and vaccines would not be allowed fast track status as they have now
it means money
No. The CDC wouldn’t do that.(sar.)