Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio Woman Arrested and Tased For Not Wearing a Mask at Son's Outdoor Football Game
PJ Media ^ | Megan Fox

Posted on 09/24/2020 7:35:30 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: OHelix

Mandatory conditions for spectators: Ohio State (contact sports)
Spectators must conduct daily symptom assessments.
Anyone experiencing symptoms must stay home.*
• Six-feet social distancing must be maintained between
individuals.
• No congregating before or after practices or games is prohibited.
MASK WEARING IS NOT MANDATORY! (read about it)


41 posted on 09/24/2020 12:30:55 PM PDT by radialenginefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: radialenginefan

So, are you suggesting that the reports I heard regarding the facility policy requiring masks being conspicuously disclosed at upon entry, as well as on the restrooms, was factually inaccurate?

Certainly, if there were no law nor facility policy (or maybe even a facility policy that was inadequately disclosed) then I agree that the police were out of line unless there is something else we don’t know.

But, I heard a description (I don’t remember it verbatim) that characterized the facility policy as being more than adequately disclosed.

Regardless, even if the police were TOTALLY out of line and COMPLETELY unjustified in arresting her, she still resisted arrest for, reportedly, two minutes prior to being tazed.


42 posted on 09/24/2020 1:06:20 PM PDT by OHelix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bgill
Kids were holding, not shackled, onto ropes so they don’t wander off long before covid.

Silly poster. Just watch what happens when you fail to comply. Arrested, tazed and worse. This entire COVID scam has us all in chains.

43 posted on 09/24/2020 3:04:51 PM PDT by The Iceman Cometh (Donald J Trump 45th President of the United States! MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bshaw
I see a big suit.

And a big payout. The police department in their statement admitted that the woman they arrested told them she has asthma and could not wear a mask. That puts her under the ADA since asthma is a disability. So as soon as she said that the school and the police officer are violating federal law, and violently so.

This is no different than a school requiring that everyone on the premises be able to climb a flight of stairs to sit in the bleachers, and then having the school resource officer arrest a person in a wheelchair for sitting in their wheelchair.

Good luck to the school and the police officer. If he is lucky his union and the government will pay his share of the damages award.

44 posted on 09/24/2020 4:58:25 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OHelix
She was in violation of law and/or policy and refused to remedy that appropriately when given the opportunity.

Except she wasn't. Federal law, the Americans with Disabilities Act, supercedes state law and definitely school district policies. ADA allows people to not wear masks when they, as the police admitted, have a disability.

The basis for the arrest is about as lame as arresting a blind person with a seeing eye dog because the school prohibits dogs on their property.

45 posted on 09/24/2020 5:03:34 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing
"Except she wasn't. Federal law, the Americans with Disabilities Act, supercedes state law and definitely school district policies. ADA allows people to not wear masks when they, as the police admitted, have a disability.

So, for the sake of argument, assuming she was exempt under the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the police were ultimately wrong to arrest her (presumably she had explained that exemption to the officers as opposed to just asserting she was entitled to disregard the facility's posted policy)... does the Americans with Disabilities Act entitle her to resist arrest?

46 posted on 09/24/2020 8:26:24 PM PDT by OHelix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: OHelix
does the Americans with Disabilities Act entitle her to resist arrest?

Let me guess. You already know the answer to that question.

No need to explain the ADA to anybody, they are obliged to know the law. Do you really think you could successfully defend an ADA claim based on the argument that a school district was not aware of their obligation under the law?

47 posted on 09/24/2020 9:14:15 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing

Nope.


48 posted on 09/25/2020 6:16:49 AM PDT by OHelix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson