Because they’re wrong.
2.5 trillion yuan
not 2,500 trillion yuan.
went to the original site
Here is a more accurate picture ( I think ) from Reuters:
SOURCE: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-evergrande-idUSKBN26J082
“China Evergrandes borrowings totalled 835.5 billion yuan at June-end, of which onshore trust loans and bank lending made up 41% and 29% respectively.”
835 Billion Yuan amounts to only $120 Billion ( OK, still a large sum, but not unmanageable from a Chinese government rescue point of view ).
Some third-world author that doesn’t know the difference between conventions using ‘.’ vs ‘,’ as a placeholder in numbers?
You might say that was an “Epoch” failure.