In this case, GP referred to the Tweet of Maggie Haberman of the New York Times. If she is wrong, then GP is wrong.
That sounds about right for GP. When a Tweet from someone else’s reporter becomes the source of your reporting, I’d say you’re a pretty pathetic media outlet.
Democrats, who have unanimously objected to Judge Barrett’s nomination, warned Friday that if hearings were held without an understanding of the full extent of the virus’s spread in Washington, an “already illegitimate process will become a dangerous one.” And they said a virtual hearing for such a significant position would not be acceptable.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/10/02/us/trump-vs-biden
Why would a virtual hearing be unacceptable for this hearing only? Explain Chuckie