Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yesthatjallen

I’m not so sure they want to keep pursuing this. It could lead to the actual source of the leak. If that happens it will destroy the alphabet agencies. Not to mention what it will do to the dem party.


16 posted on 10/08/2020 12:21:45 PM PDT by JoSixChip (Its not about color, its about character.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JoSixChip

I thought Donna Brazile knew what went on with this. Didn’t she say something in a book about it?


18 posted on 10/08/2020 12:28:44 PM PDT by dandiegirl (BOBBY m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: JoSixChip

That is probably why Twitter is not cooperating. Definitely not to protect a conservative who first published the theory


30 posted on 10/08/2020 1:10:08 PM PDT by boxlunch (The US Pravda ( MSM), Demcheviks, leftists, Chicomms, Soros. All in this together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: JoSixChip
I’m not so sure they want to keep pursuing this. It could lead to the actual source of the leak. If that happens it will destroy the alphabet agencies. Not to mention what it will do to the dem party.

This is a conundrum wrapped in a question.

WHO 'forged' the document? Are they forged or real? You can't know the motive until you know the suspect. Why is Twitter refusing to help? What do they know? Are they protecting a source? Is this disinformation to discredit real documents?

There are lots of question about this one.

44 posted on 10/08/2020 2:48:11 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson