False flag? October surprise? Attorneys for Whitmer-kidnapping plotter claims FBI informant PUSHED others to act

NOQ Report ^ | October 13, 2020 | Scott Boyd

[Hojczyk]

In the case of the alleged plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, were big talkers pushed into the early stages of big action by an FBI informant?

Deep within a story from the Detroit Free Press is a potential bombshell if it pans out as true.

Defense lawyers contend that there was no probable cause to arrest and charge the suspect, arguing, among other things, that the suspects had no operational plan to do anything, were engaged in all legal activities — including talking in encrypted group chats and practicing military exercises with lawfully owned guns — and that it was the informants and undercover agents who “pushed” others to do illegal things.

As defense attorney Scott Graham points out, the FBI informant who wore wires to meetings with the militia may have been more than an undercover observer. He was one of the most active leaders of the group pushing the rest of them to follow through with their criminal plans. Clearly, Graham is promoting a narrative of entrapment, but the underlying sentiment here is much more important to all Americans. Was the FBI trying to egg on a domestic terrorist attack as a false flag maneuver? If so, what could be their motivation?

[Uber-Eng]

Spirochete,

Excellent link on that Culwell Center. Even though it’s Wikipedia, it appears to provide a very good explanation without the usual bias one way or another.