Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coronal

“Accepting the government’s view, he said, “would mean that a president is free to defame anyone who criticizes his conduct or impugns his character.””

Wait a minute. Didn’t this all start off with some women who defamed Trumps character? So Trump didn’t have the right to defend himself? What has our legal system become.


11 posted on 10/27/2020 11:03:21 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Revel

Umm, she made unproven allegations against his character

that are so negative they are 100% defamatory

where are these same people ripping her for defaming a sitting president’s character

oh, they don’t like the sitting president

theats why they defended obama against negative statements but not Teump

oh i see now


35 posted on 10/27/2020 12:04:10 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson