Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigtigermike

Several people on Twitter commented that these statistics need to be run for some of the uncontested states.

We really need to see how much of what looks a suspicious anomaly is indeed indicative of fraud. If that is the case, then the uncontested states would show much smaller numbers for Biden.

You could do the same thing, perhaps, by looking for Trump only voters in the current states being analyzed.


13 posted on 11/07/2020 3:02:25 PM PST by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint

Been saying, compare Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania to Ohio, where Trump won comfortably.

All of these States should have marched in lockstep, more or less. Philadelphia, Detroit and Milwaukee, should have mirrored those of Cleveland.

Of course the difference is, Ohio has a Republican as Governor.

All Elections Matter!


17 posted on 11/07/2020 3:04:28 PM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: InterceptPoint

I agree and run them compared to previous elections if possible. That’s where an anomaly would be accurately discover. I think the fraud will be discovered on the computer with ‘funny numbers’ more so than actual physical activity


36 posted on 11/07/2020 3:21:07 PM PST by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson