Posted on 11/09/2020 5:27:47 PM PST by george76
The following information is excerpted from a lawsuit filed in Detroit, Michigan.
Defendants systematically processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets. When a voter’s name could not be found, the election worker assigned the ballot to a random name already in the QVF to a person who had not voted. Defendants instructed election workers to not verify signatures on absentee ballots, to backdate absentee ballots, and to process such ballots regardless of their validity.
After election officials announced the last absentee ballots had been received, another batch of unsecured and unsealed ballots, without envelopes, arrived in trays at the TCF Center. There were tens of thousands of these absentee ballots, and apparently every ballot was counted and attributed only to Democratic candidates. Defendants instructed election workers to process ballots that appeared after the election deadline and to falsely report that those ballots had been received prior to November 3, 2020 deadline.
Defendants systematically used false information to process ballots, such as using incorrect or false birthdays. Many times, the election workers inserted new names into the QVF after the election and recorded these new voters as having a birthdate of 1/1/1900.
On a daily basis leading up to the election, City of Detroit election workers and employees coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrat party. These workers and employees encouraged voters to do a straight Democrat ballot. These election workers and employees went over to the voting booths with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.
Unsecured ballots arrived at the TCF Center loading garage, not in sealed ballot boxes, without any chain of custody, and without envelopes. Defendant election officials and workers refused to record challenges to their processes and removed challengers from the site if they politely voiced a challenge. After poll challengers started discovering the fraud taking place at the TCF Center, Defendant election officials and workers locked credentialed challengers out of the counting room so they could not observe the process, during which time tens of thousands of ballots were processed.
Defendant election officials and workers allowed ballots to be duplicated by hand without allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate. In fact, election officials and workers repeatedly obstructed poll challengers from observing. Defendants permitted thousands of ballots to be filled out by hand and duplicated on site without oversight from poll challengers.
If you go to the Michigan SOS link in my first post on this thread you can see if they returned a ballot for 2020 or not, and if so when it was received.
I don’t know enough about Mich voting procedures to know if these could get thrown out later in the process after reception but the dead voter was clearly registered and sent a ballot in.
They’re electing two senators in Georgia in January.
...pretty specific allegations....
__________________________________________
They have signed sworn affidavits backed up by observers, video, audio and similar observations, similarly sworn and substantiated in multiple venues. The technological violations are explained by numerous fact experts, complete with diagrams any non-techie can follow, backed up with video and photos.
This single lawsuit is 78 pages. The others are equally voluminous. 50-60 plaintiffs in one case. One could extrapolate that they have similar numbers in each of the many others across 6-7 states.
The word *systemic* is powerful. This is disenfranchisement.
People were systematically denied a vote based on exercising their free choice. Some people were privileged above others. Federal Laws were applied differently within states and between states. The Constitution was not followed.
The media can say the moon is made of green cheese. That is not moot. The SCOTUS rules on Constitutional violations. There are enough of those in enough venues to constitute evidence in multiple cases.
14th Amendment.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (the 1st sentence of which specifically references voting rights)
...no time for a do-over election after the cases are heard, and before the Electoral College slates have to be submitted.
____________________________
It will go to the legislatures for a list of Electors. That list will go to the House. Rs in control at both venues for all disputed states (except Nevada).
“. . .That is our right under US constitution which does not proscribe any penalty for freedom of cheating”
Partially correct. . .ahem. . .actually there is a penalty for republicans that cheat, not dems. . .just to be clear
/S
I stand corrected!
If some poll worker followed me into the voting booth I’d beat them to death.
“If Donald Trump was losing in Michigan, there would be no need to cheat. If they weren’t cheating, then they wouldn’t have removed the observers. Donald Trump won Michigan.”
I am more and more leaning toward believing that Trump won states that are not even being called into question at all for one reason or another. The truth may be that the fraud is worse than almost anyone suspects.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.