Posted on 11/10/2020 7:04:29 PM PST by Lockbox
Fascinating bump
Good post and totally agree. I saw a YT of a guy analyzing Fla and he showed that the theft of votes were almost all in red counties. Trump still won them so no red flag but trump got considerably less votes in those counties as they went to biden
The people attempting to steal the election are lazy... probably because they know corrupt reporters won't look closely... or if they do they won't understand the logic or math that shows this stuff is like big red flashing signs screaming 'FRAUD'.
If vote switching is happening, wouldn’t that be revealed in a simple recount?
I believe THAT it is fraud. But we still need to find out HOW it happened. Were illegal votes fed into the tabulators? Were legal votes by Rs for Trump cast and then vote totals switched by a program after the fact? Or some of both?
if you’re short on time, start here:
https://youtu.be/Ztu5Y5obWPk?t=1410
I watched the whole video.
MI has straight party voting option.
They plotted straight party Trump voting % to the difference between single candidate
and strait party vote %.
The data shows as republican straight party voting increased the single candidate voter voting Trump decreased in a linear way
In a heavy republican precinct one would think the single candidate ballot should trend voting heavy for Trump. But in stead the more Republican the precinct the more single candidate ballots voted for Biden.
Just doesnt make sense so given the linear nature of the data, they contend machine vote switching occured.
I am looking at it from a completely different perspective.
I am looking at the graph that shows a linear drop off, a drop off that descends at the same slope (rate) as other precincts, not only in that same county, but is replicated in other counties.
I am going from memory, but I think he showed five counties, and only one of them had what could be called a “normal” distribution without the drop off seen in the other four, and that one county was a heavily Democrat county which I assume was widely predicted to go to Biden in any case.
My reaction when watching this was not that the assertion that non-straight ticket voting should be similar to the straight ticket voting needs to be proved-I readily acknowledge that someone who does not vote a straight ticket may well indeed have as their motivation the desire NOT to vote for President Trump.
What made me nearly jump up and down in steaming anger was the shape of those curves, from county to county, and the nearly identical tangent of them.
In my opinion (which I acknowledge may be imperfect) the dire need for explanation does not fall on the assertion that voting by different methods should produce a similar result, but instead what needs urgently to be explained is the reason why there is a near uniform distribution in the decrease in votes for Trump as the percent of Trump straight-ticket voting increases.
I understand (to a degree) the power and limitations of analyzing data, and I was originally baffled as to why they chose these particular metrics, because as the saying goes, ‘There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics’. I have found over the years that if you are determined enough, and the consumer of the data is motivated enough, you can find a way to make darn near any data set say what the consumer of the data wants said.
Sad but true, and I fell victim to my own inclinations over the years by massaging data to say what I wanted it to say, rather than letting the information speak for itself. It is an insidious thing to fall prey to, and one has to constantly be on guard lest that pit of obsequious data crunching be unwittingly (or wittingly) followed.
When I watched this video, at the end, I lay in bed trying to fall asleep, but I had a mental carousel going around and around on this, and I kept asking myself if I was being objective enough to be as angry as I felt I justifiably was.
As I said, I was baffled as to why they chose those metrics they did, because if you look hard enough for the right filter to sift with, you can find anything you need to, and I was concerned that in my ignorance, I wasn’t seeing their path clearly enough to discern why they chose those parameters. But I also know that the other side of that coin is also true-getting information out of data involves FINDING the parameters which will cause a result to drop out the other side.
And I have always felt that data analysis is a balancing act between those two things, so I had concerns, the main one being that the choice of those parameters CAUSES that uniform-appearing behavior seen in the graphs.
However, I came to the conclusion that using that same method in the heavily Democrat country showed no such uniform curve display, so I am NOT inclined to believe their choice of parameters introduced that characteristic shape across ALL the other four counties.
As both Dr. Shiva and Benny Smith pointedly illustrate: the pattern is TOO perfect and uniform to be random. It is, in my opinion, almost irrefutable proof of an algorithm. Like Benny Smith in the video said...he isn’t 100% sure.
He is about 99% sure.
Ideologically speaking (and no doubt, personally many of them as well) they are desperate. I have always thought Leftists to be intellectually lazy because their ideology makes them that way, but in the last four years, as Trump appointed justices and judges, built a wall and so on, the Left became visibly desperate.
Four more years of Trump, and there might well be a larger conservative presence on the Supreme Court, and there definitely will be at the circuit and appellate court levels.
That would negate or lessen the Left’s favored mechanism for ideological rule-the rule of judicial dictat.
So, like a soldier who knows that if he stays where he is he is likely to be hit by enemy fire and must move to live, and does so across a hot field of fire because he is desperate to live...the Left has done the same thing.
They don’t think they will get caught, and in reality, don’t really care if they are caught since the rewards of successful criminality far, FAR outweigh the penalties in their situation. They know the media and the Deep State have their backs, and while they likely won’t go to jail, if they do, they will be Leftist martyrs.
Scumbags. I despise them all with a white hot passion.
I have been thinking about that.
Why? Why did they seem to focus more malignantly on areas that were more heavily Republican (as evidenced by straight party voting rates) to skim the votes off?
I would have to conclude they probably thought it would be less noticeable. If the county was going to go 70% for Trump, and he won 60% instead, that 10% would be less noticeable than an area where Republicans might only get 25% and instead get 15%.
Just a guess...
This analysis seemed more significant to me.
They are unlikely to get a Perry Mason "I DID IT!" chain of emails or texts. But I hope against hope that this sinks them.
The Dems are going to have a meltdown when Trump wins.
Yes.
that is why the mainstream fake news media was rushed into service Saturday....to get the dims all excited about Biden “winning”.
Then when bad Orange Man takes it away from Biden, the crazies in the dim party and the street thugs will go nuts.
And the rest of us will need to be very careful who we allow to get close to us.
...........
As the facts are released by Trump’s legal team, there should be a dribbling out of facts to let momentum rise so the facts cannot be debunked (hence, the term, facts). That SHOULD allow the Left to see the truth...that will prevent a knee-jerk explosion of violence...of course, this SHOULD work, but Soros-paid rioters want to riot as they are pre-paid. Perhaps someone creative can post a meme of a Soros Pre-paid riot card, perhaps in denomination of $1000 worth of rioting. Kinda like a Home Depot gift card.
That’s exactly right. Flies right under the radar. My prayer is: NOT ANY MORE. We are on to the bastards and will expose every nook and cranny of cheating and stealing.
Although I’ve wanted Barr to do alot of things over these last couple of years, I’m VERY grateful he’s instituted this investigation and I believe it is the difference between a Trump and Biden presidency.
I was under the impression that identical twins had matching DNA. So, technically, more than a 1 in a billion chance.
This is what a Dem meltdown looks like.... as in, they knew they were losing....IM MICHIGAN!!!!....so they said burn it all down....!
Sorry a$$ losers can’t handle losing a “blue” state to Trump/MAGA.
I hope you are right. For years now, I have been one of the people saying “give them time” but have come to conclude that there is a “Deep State”, and the members of it don’t want anyone raked over the coals on it, so...nothing is going to happen.
I thought the criminal political persecution of President Trump, Carter Page, George Papdopoulous, and General Flynn and the associated conspirators was the biggest political scandal in the history of this country, but I believe this attempt to steal the election completely dwarfs that, hard as that is to think.
I am also very cynical now. If this goes to the Supreme Court, there is no chance in Hell Justice Roberts will side with any decision to do the right thing. I have concluded he is compromised, possibly a pedophile or closeted homosexual, and the Left has shown they have no problem at all bringing whatever forces they can to bear.
I never thought Democrats would resort to murder either, and the last four years have made me look at the Seth Rich murder in a very different light.
But the founding fathers forgot to give the states the right
to regulate travel by automobile.
Have you ever wondered why?
—
I always thought it was because they were too caught up in regulating airlines.
we don’t need Roberts.
https://mmmcpa.com/blog/theranos-elizabeth-holmes-and-benfords-law/
Makes my point even more.
When someone says “It’s around a one in a billion chance”, that leaves the impression of “There’s still a chance”.
When someone says “There’s less chance of this being wrong than there is of DNA being used to convict the wrong person.” that leaves the impression of “there’s no doubt”.
Here's the bitchute interview which details a small part of the fraud in the 2018 and 2020 elections: 58 min
He and his company did all of this work for free because they did not like what they saw.
Russel Ramsland Election Fraud Interviews 2019 elections: 13min
Also linked is www.EveryLegalVote.com
Find the latest information on fraudulent and non-fraudulent votes by state.
Report Voter Fraud - If you have experienced voter fraud, please go to this website to give information that you deem pertinent to the investigation.
Read Stories on Voter Fraud
Fraud PH shows common ways that vote or ballot fraud can occur in an election
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.