Photo by Markus Winkler from Pexels
Posted on 11/11/2020 9:57:56 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Photo by Markus Winkler from Pexels
In Wisconsin on the night of the election, President Trump was winning early into the morning. However, when Americans woke up on the following day Joe Biden had somehow taken the lead in Wisconsin after a vote dump of 100,000 votes appeared overnight.
Everyone in the US knew Wisconsin had been stolen and the votes for Biden all appeared at once in the middle of the night. The concerns with the unreasonable increase in ballots in Wisconsin led one expert to share with us his analysis on Wisconsin voter data as it currently stands. Our expert who remains anonymous shared with us his analysis using the audit statistical technique known as Benford Analysis. This technique identifies outliers in data sets. Our expert shared:
I saw that some people had the idea of analyzing vote totals in context of Benford’s Law, so I ran a first-digit analysis on precinct-level vote numbers coming out of Wisconsin, using data from the 15 largest counties (skipping 2 which had unworkable data).
Of the 4 counties, 802 aggregated precincts comprising the Milwaukee Metropolitan Area, we get a significant deviation from the expected using Biden’s vote totals, and a p-value of 0.00002 (0.002% probability of a result at least as extreme as this one). Clearly, it does not follow the expected pattern. Trump’s vote totals are much more consistent, with P = 0.87. [The Biden data makes no sense in Milwaukee.]
Aggregating the other 11 largest counties, 1040 precincts, both appear normal for both candidates:
We then reported that Milwaukee had greater voter turnout in seven Democrat Wards than registered voters! This was from the Milwaukee City Wire:
Seven City of Milwaukee voting wards reported more 2020 U.S. Presidential election votes than they had registered voters, according to an analysis of results and Secretary of State files.
Today we have additional information on the results in Milwaukee. According to the Milwaukee City Wire:
The City of Milwaukee reported record turnout of 84 percent Tuesday; 243,144 of 288,833 registered city voters cast a ballot.
Biden defeated Trump in Milwaukee 195,034 to 48,110, a margin of 145,916. He won 80 percent of the city’s total vote.
Of the city’s 327 voting wards, 90 reported turnout of greater than 90 percent; 201 reported turnout higher than 80 percent.
In 2016, city voter turnout was 75 percent.
Biden ran up gaudy margins in many Milwaukee voting wards.
He won 588 votes to Trump’s 10 in the 107th voting ward, located in the city’s Franklin Heights neighborhood. It’s other two voting wards voted 411 to 14 and 968 to 33 for Biden– a grand total of 1,967 to 57.
So now Milwaukee is reporting that the precincts in Milwaukee are not over 100% voter turnout? What the hell is going on there?
We might need Gateway Pundit after all. Call it the hutzpah effect.
We might need Gateway Pundit after all. Call it the hutzpah effect.
RE: We might need Gateway Pundit after all. Call it the hutzpah effect.
You sound very reluctant to give credibility to Gateway Pundit’s reports.
I have been burned in the past by citing GP and then discovering the report I was citing was false and having to retract my claim. So I am reluctant now to trust them.
Hypothetically speaking, they might have added the same-day registrants to the “registered voters” column, thereby increasing it to exceed the number of votes cast, i.e. pushing the number back below 100% - without touching a single ballot.
Everyone in WI knows the state was stolen by the DNC fraud machine.
GP is the journalistic equivalent of a shotgun. Not all the pellets hit the target, but they spray them anyways.
They have a long record of rehashing the work of others and sometimes it is right and sometimes it is wrong.
They also love very hyperbolic headlines that do not always match the content or rehash in the article.
Mixed bag. I don’t ignore them completely, but I always look for more sources on the stuff that is most interesting.
You are not alone in your skepticism.
Wisconsin permits it, so people using the number of "registered voters" are using information that is inherently out of date on election day. People who were not previously registered can show up and vote.
The margin is actually 146,924.
Yes. In my WI township, I remain “registered” if I vote within 4 years. If I ever missed and was removed, I could register at the time of voting. That being said, I don’t think registration lists are exactly meticulously maintained.
Yep, total left wing DNC SOP.
While acting out massive fraudulent schemes, use your 98% controlled “power of the pen” to blame your enemy for your crimes.
When the evidence of the felonious and treasonous fraudulent crimes are just too large to hide, order your “pen” (mass media/press) to both divert attention, and be silent, and to act like nothing is there. All the while using every government office, and all its “police” agencies to track down all evidence, and all loose ends, to eliminate the threat.
While this is going on, other news and entertainment venue’s go to work, to mass inoculate, “normalize”, and then elevate the criminal narcissistic behavior and agenda.
Wisconsin permits same-day voter registration. The numbers people are using for number of registered voters likely don’t include all those same-day registrants.
We make it easy on them by being too eager to allege crap just because it happens to favor our side.
Well if you register the same day then you are registered and she be put in the system at the time of your registration no?
A good summary of GP
I appreciate the enthusiasm of the Hoft’s, but they will write something with a hyperbolic headline in a heartbeat.
It works for their business model. They must get a million hits a day here on FR.
>>I don’t think you would expect to see a 1 as the leading digit for Biden in very many precincts. I don’t think you can use Benford’s Law in this case.<<
I think you’re right. Benford’s Law has some conditions that must be satisfied for it to apply. As you’ve described, precincts of similar size with one party getting a large share of the vote violate the conditions.
I suppose it’s possible that a check of the second digits might shed some light. I doubt it though.
Anyway, the best way to win a court case is to demonstrate intentional violation of election law in a city. If that occurred it’s reasonable to assume that cheating was underway. Otherwise, why take the chance on violating election laws?
Eventually, your registration will show up, but the vote tally is the premier task at hand on election day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.