Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Wants Supreme Court To Decide The Election
Newsmax ^ | 11-17-2020 | Jeffrey Rodack

Posted on 11/17/2020 11:56:24 AM PST by blam

Rudy Giuliani, the attorney for President Donald Trump, said the campaign is prepared to lose election cases in an effort to throw the final decision on the presidential race to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Giuliani’s comments came during a Tuesday interview on Fox Business' "Mornings With Maria."

The Daily Mail reported that Giuliani was due to appear in court remotely on Tuesday in a case involving an attempt to have hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots removed from the count in Pennsylvania.

“Frankly this is a case that we would like to get to the Supreme Court,” he said. “So we're prepared in some of these cases to lose and to appeal and to get it to the Supreme Court.

“You might remember in Bush v. Gore, the Bush campaign lost in the state of Florida because it was a Democratic court. You're not going to win every one of these ... but in some cases you win, some cases you lose.”

Trump has maintained he would “easily” be declared the victor in the race if just the “legal votes" were counted.

And earlier this month he tweeted that the “U.S. Supreme Court should decide.”

Meanwhile, Giuliani is in charge of Trump's campaign lawsuits and public communications about them.

Trump put his personal attorney at the top spot after a lawsuit was dropped in Maricopa County, Arizona....

(snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: election; fakenews; giuliani; newsmax; scotus; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2020 11:56:24 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

It is that big.


2 posted on 11/17/2020 11:57:35 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

A headline CNN would be proud of.

Newsmax...c'mon man.

3 posted on 11/17/2020 11:58:09 AM PST by truthkeeper (All Trump Has Going for Him is the Votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I agree that this all needs to be decided by the Supremes.


4 posted on 11/17/2020 11:58:24 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I am not a believer Newsmax is the answer, more mind games with word manipulation in my opinion .

Never the less we just want the supreme court to uphold the constitution and protect the rule of law. Is that too much to ask for.


5 posted on 11/17/2020 11:59:20 AM PST by MagillaX (My)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

He doesn’t want.

It’s the law.


6 posted on 11/17/2020 12:00:01 PM PST by Eddie01 (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

There are some legislators that I believe won . . .but a declaration won’t help them.


7 posted on 11/17/2020 12:00:55 PM PST by Maudeen (A must listen! https://www.biblegateway.com/audio/dramatized/niv/Rev.1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MagillaX

I am not a believer Newsmax is the answer, more mind games with word manipulation in my opinion .

Newsmax is small time tabloidish, they need to step it up if they want to increase their views.

8 posted on 11/17/2020 12:01:02 PM PST by 1Old Pro ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

People are looking for alternative news to the turncoat Fox. They ought to step it up.


9 posted on 11/17/2020 12:03:07 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam

We know we can’t trust Roberts. The only other question mark is Kavanaugh. Will he turn Souter on us this soon? (I fully expect him to do so eventually.)


10 posted on 11/17/2020 12:03:09 PM PST by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

They will note take it if all we have is an allegation of fraud in Venezuela in 2013.


11 posted on 11/17/2020 12:05:43 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

I think the four states with obvious fraud should select their electors to the EC via a vote in the state legislature.


12 posted on 11/17/2020 12:06:05 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

And Ruth Bader Ginberg just happened to pass when she did........And Amy Coney Barrett took her place.


13 posted on 11/17/2020 12:06:25 PM PST by Americannae1362
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Nice when it works out.


14 posted on 11/17/2020 12:06:37 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Rush talked about this in last segment also ran audio


15 posted on 11/17/2020 12:07:03 PM PST by mosesdapoet (mosesdapoet aka L.J.Keslin posting here for the record hoping somebody might read and pass around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

This election is broken enough that it needs to be decided in Congress per the Constitution - where we win.
Then we need clean up elections so that this doesn’t happen again. Maybe a total purge of the voter rolls, after which everyone has to re-register providing Real ID compliant ID or its equivalent.
Then maybe restricting vote by mail and absentee balloting.
And putting up some serious penalties for preventing poll watchers from watching the process and transparency in the counting process.
I am not sure the Federales hold sway over this. I seem to remember the Constitution leaving that up to the states.
Of course the Democrats will be against cleaning things up.


16 posted on 11/17/2020 12:08:28 PM PST by Little Ray (The Left and Right no longer have anything in common. A House divided against itself cannot stand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

We know we can’t trust Roberts. The only other question mark is Kavanaugh. Will he turn Souter on us this soon? (I fully expect him to do so eventually.)

Yeah, Kavenaugh is anxious to prove to the left media how 'fair' he is so they will be nice to him.

17 posted on 11/17/2020 12:11:57 PM PST by HandBasketHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam

No. I think the ARMED American people should decide. It was a coup. You don’t leave a coup up to nine imperfect humans.

Particularly when the level of corruption was of such a character that those 9 will be compelled by an offer they can’t refuse.

There is a Plan B in the works.


18 posted on 11/17/2020 12:14:32 PM PST by Salvavida (quicker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

I hope it happens.

But that still leaves us with the corruption in Georgia and how to deal with those seats


19 posted on 11/17/2020 12:18:35 PM PST by ZULU (Impeach John Roberts for corruption. SOROS IS "SPARTACUS" BOOKER'S LANISTA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blam

I’d feel better if Rudy wasn’t such a clown


20 posted on 11/17/2020 12:23:17 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson