"And just like the Defendants’ obstructive behavior with the interrogatories, the Defendants delay and over-litigate what should be a straightforward process with respect to Plaintiffs’ subpoenas.Our evidentiary hearing is set for 10 days after the filing date of this suit. The Court has stated it wants to hear evidence, quickly. In order to comply with the Court’s tight schedule in a timely fashion, Plaintiffs filed the subpoenas on November 15, 2020.
- If the Court had not scheduled an evidentiary hearing, these subpoenas may not have been necessary.
- If the Defendants’ had not refused to meet the Plaintiffs in the middle on the interrogatories, these subpoenas may not have been necessary.
- If the Defendants hadn’t attempted to kill democracy in the darkness of unobserved election processes when they denied our poll watchers access to vote counting, none of this would be necessary.
But the Court has set this case on an expedited schedule, and the Defendants have ignored that by continuing to delay, and by forcing Plaintiffs to spend time and resources on litigating over facts and testimony to which they have a right."
The particulars of yesterday are such that the Defendants (Biden, Boockvar, et al) are attempting to run out the clock on cert deadline.
From where did your language at post #13 originate? One of the Plaintiff’s briefs?