Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama-Appointed Judge in PA Sends Outrageous Message to Trump Attorney
Western Journal ^ | 17 Nov 2020 | Jack Davis

Posted on 11/21/2020 6:03:31 PM PST by blueplum

“Scaringi filed a request to delay the hearing, noting its complexity, his status as new to the case and recent turnover in the Trump legal team.

“Having only been retained today, Plaintiffs’ new counsel need additional time to adequately prepare this case for the upcoming oral argument and evidentiary hearing,” Scaringi wrote in a court filing.

“...“Furthermore, this is a case of significant complexity and importance to the people of the United States of America,” he said. “And, further, the court record compiled in such a short period of time already contains 148 docket entries by Plaintiffs, multiple Defendants and multiple Intervenor Defendants.”

The judge refused to give Trump’s new counsel time to further prepare, sending what many would consider to be an outrageous and partisan message to the attorney, the president and the country.

Despite the fact that the case could determine who serves as America’s president, and one side has been amassing its argument for two weeks while the other is barely 24 hours into his role, Brann rejected the request.

“Oral argument will take place as scheduled, tomorrow, November 17, 2020,” the judge wrote. “Counsel for the parties are expected to be prepared for argument and questioning...."

(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: brann; constitution; dueprocess; legislatingjudges; matthewbrann; matthewwbrann; nosignofkraken; scotus; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
something smells
1 posted on 11/21/2020 6:03:31 PM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueplum

They are delaying to block access to SCOTUS.


2 posted on 11/21/2020 6:04:51 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Yeah. The RAT Party.


3 posted on 11/21/2020 6:05:47 PM PST by Howie66 ("Ghislane Maxwell Didn't Kill Herself" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

“Don’t bother preparing. The court has already made up its mind.”


4 posted on 11/21/2020 6:06:22 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

The Judge isn’t a Dem - he is a lifelong Republican, a Federalist Society Member, who spent 18 years on the Pennsylvania GOP Executive Committee. He was selected by Sen. Pat Toomey as part of a trade.


5 posted on 11/21/2020 6:07:03 PM PST by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

If Trumps team is delaying, it’s to force it beyond 12/14/2020. However, this judges actions is grounds for a successful appeal.


6 posted on 11/21/2020 6:07:44 PM PST by eastexsteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

.............you beat me too it, my vast experience with civil judges in civil cases is that when they say something stupid like this it invariably means they have already made up their mind.....................


7 posted on 11/21/2020 6:11:19 PM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas

And is it grounds for appeal?


8 posted on 11/21/2020 6:13:18 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

“They are delaying to block access to SCOTUS”

If you think SCOTUS is going to hear any of these cases, you are dreaming.


9 posted on 11/21/2020 6:15:35 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

“ And is it grounds for appeal?”

These are all nonjusticeable political questions. The Constitution reserves these matters to the Congress, the USSC will never again make the mistake they made in agreeing to hear Bush v. Gore.


10 posted on 11/21/2020 6:18:56 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
Like my brother says time and time again, all the crap and corruption we are going through today is because the last Republican President we had before Trump, left office in 1989. That's Jan. 20th 1989 to Jan. 20th 2017, TWENTY EIGHT YEARS of extreme corruption, rat bastards who sold out this country for 28 years and now they very well may have defeated Trump with the most crooked election in US history. There is not a swamp to drain, there is a freakin' OCEAN.


11 posted on 11/21/2020 6:20:56 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free equal justice under the law will never exist in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

“If you think SCOTUS is going to hear any of these cases, you are dreaming.“

if you think SCOTUS will refuse to hear these cases, you’re a nutcase.


12 posted on 11/21/2020 6:21:33 PM PST by semaj (Death to Traitors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Don’t bother preparing. The court has already made up its mind”

All the important decisions about ending the Trump Administration were made in the summer. Including the decision that the courts would rapidly dispose of any legal challenges.


13 posted on 11/21/2020 6:21:51 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Pennsylvania certifies its votes on Monday. Delaying the hearing would not have allowed Trump’s attorneys a chance to make their case before then. It’s not the judges fault that Trump’s lawyers kept quitting, and he refused permission for one of them to withdraw to keep continuity.


14 posted on 11/21/2020 6:22:50 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semaj

“ if you think SCOTUS will refuse to hear these cases, you’re a nutcase.”

Check back with me after cert is denied.


15 posted on 11/21/2020 6:23:01 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda; blueplum
is because the last Republican President we had before Trump, left office in 1989.

So you count GHWB 41 as the last previous Republican President, and don't count GWB 43 as one?

16 posted on 11/21/2020 6:25:28 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57
And is it grounds for appeal?

On it's own? Probably not. But I'm sure Giuliani will find additional reasons for appealing. It isn't ending here.

17 posted on 11/21/2020 6:28:15 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

“Check back with me after cert is denied.“

Will do.


18 posted on 11/21/2020 6:31:24 PM PST by semaj (Death to Traitors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

What’s outrageous or partisan about denying a motion for continuance and telling lead counsel to be prepared to argue? Particularly in a case like this that will become moot if it is not resolved within the next couple weeks.


19 posted on 11/21/2020 6:32:42 PM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

LEFT office in 1989. REAGAN, he was the last. GH was a sell out to China. All this crap today is a direct result of GH Bush, the biggest mistake Reagan ever did was pick GH as his VP. We would have never had the Clinton criminal cabal, or his RINO son or the Obama caliphate nor all these enemies of the USA today in our government hellbent on its destruction. 28 years of corruption we are dealing with today, and they very well may succeed in ending this country.


20 posted on 11/21/2020 6:36:40 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free equal justice under the law will never exist in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson