Posted on 11/25/2020 6:55:04 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Sometimes I stumble across an article that so perfectly explains a concept that it would be criminal if I failed to share it. That’s the case with a detailed discussion someone sent me that explains with exquisite clarity that, no, you’re not imagining fraud in the 2020 election, and yes, it was the type of fraud that could easily sway the national election.
Gil Sanders, at the Thomistic Thinker, wrote a post entitled “Skeptical of Voter Fraud in 2020? Here’s Your Evidence.” It is a meticulous piece of work that helps, just through the sheer volume of material, both pro and con, about the 2020 election.
Sanders begins by talking about the fact that we Trump supporters can feel that something is wrong. After all (and this is me speaking, not Sanders), you and I both know that, throughout the campaign, there was no whiff of the underdog about Trump. While a doddering Biden hid in his basement, Trump was out there making peace in the Middle East, resurrecting the economy that the Democrats had tried to kill, rising from his Wuhan virus sickbed within days, and barnstorming the country holding rallies that attracted tens of thousands of people.
This man was a winner – and when it came to the votes that were recorded for him, those showed a winner too. Even assuming, as I do, that Democrats deleted or switched millions of Trump votes, Trump still gained 10 million more votes than he did in 2016, and substantially increased his votes from minority voters. Meanwhile, we’re being asked to believe that an incoherent man, mired in corruption, who refused to tell people what his policies would be, not only beat Trump but beat Obama’s total in 2008!
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Either we are a moral nation, or not.
If we allow cheaters to win after getting caught, we can no longer claim to be a moral nation.
Why can’t we get the people at FOX news to explain this?
“Either we are a moral nation, or not.
If we allow cheaters to win after getting caught, we can no longer claim to be a moral nation.”
We are not, and we will.
They killed Epstein in front of the nation and got away with it. They know as long as the media is all in, they can do anything.
Because they are not moral. Quit expecting morality to arise from wickedness
Yet Americans are being asked to believe that
<><> an incoherent demented man,
<><> hiding in his basement,
<><> mired in corruption w/ his son and his parasitic family,
<><> who refused to reveal his presidential policies,
<><> who could not even draw a fly to his campaign stops,
...... not only beat Trump but that Biden even beat Obama’s total in 2008.......
If this is not useful as admissible evidence in court it won’t make any difference.
The Demonicrats are not going to get rid of a fraudulent procedure that works. They will refine it and spread it throughout the U.S. election system, like metastatic cancer.
We allow babies to be murdered in the womb.
The worship of Mammon, Moloch, and Baphomet is probably more common that Christianity.
What do you thing?
RE: If this is not useful as admissible evidence in court it won’t make any difference.
Can you educate us as to what makes useful and admissible evidence in court?
“Why can’t we get the people at FOX news to explain this?”
It’s pretty simple. This is about $$$$money. It is as if Fox jumped on a plane and made a trip to Las Vegas (where anything that happens stays in Vegas) and then went all-in on the craps table for the other side.
They’ve placed their bet and thrown out the people who “got them where they are/were.” Their bet is now on the Biden crowd! The wheel is spinning.
Screw us!
Well, screw them!
We’ll soon see how well their bet goes!
If we allow cheaters to win after getting caught, we can no longer claim to be a moral nation.
The nation then becomes corrupt from top to bottom.
This same principle can be applied to US House of Representative seats as well.
Divide and conquer.
I haven’t watched them since the election night. Heard that Tucker has come around a little. Laura Ingraham not at all.
No one, except Hannity seems to question the outcome of the election.
Bkmk
This was a fairly elegant article. The pure and simple truth is that it is so easy to gaslight us as kooks because the other side operates like organized crime. They understand about not leaving evidence or witnesses. They use the laws and procedures against us, and in ways that were not intended when those laws and procedures were written. They traffic in plausible deniability.
A couple of statements I did not understand, though (and they may just be editorial SNAFUs:
“70% of Republicans suspect foul play; far lower than it has ever been in the history of U.S. elections.” Me: far LOWER???
And...
“this fraud is significant enough to flip the election in Trump’s favor even if that is by a small margin.” Me: In TRUMP’S favor? That seems to be the opposite of what is happening.
"Can you educate us as to what makes useful and admissible evidence in court?"
In the case of the fraudulent presidential election, it would be evidence that leads to courts throwing out the fraudulent voting results in several key electoral states and restoring a valid election.
If the cheaters are allowed to win the election, then we are doomed as a republic. They will cheat and steal EVERY election, everywhere they can.
The left believes the lie. They always have.
RE: it would be evidence that leads to courts throwing out the fraudulent voting results in several key electoral states and restoring a valid election.
Such as what? give us a few examples.
“The nation then becomes corrupt from top to bottom.”
Yep, we will become a copy of the USSR, with Stalin counting the votes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.