The basis of the lawsuit had NOTHING to say about being “UNFAIR”... the signing statement ruling by the 3 judge panel is COMPLETELY INACCURATE. What the suit had was hundreds of affadavits, as well as the UnConstitutional basis of the conduct of the Election as PA ran it— DISALLOWS the election under the US Constitution.
It also cites MANY precedents for the basis of the claim in prior elections. And it had STANDING.
The Appeals Court had NO idea the Constitutionality of their Ruling. It is not Constitutional at all, and neither was PA Elections.
Correct me if I’m wrong- are saying the judges did NOT address the crux of the suit? I’ve not read it, but your description seems something the judges should have at least checked into.