Am I missing something?
Is Rudy not presenting convincing evidence or are the judged afraid to rule on this explosive case?
I don’t understand.
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
1. It’s very unfortunate that the two federal courts in Pennsylvania are slamming the door shut and rejectIng serious equal protection issues and preventIng discovery on fraud issues. And these opinions are very political in nature.
2:54pm · 27 Nov 2020 · Twitter f
The appeals court are Democrats. They are corrupt and won’t rule in Trump’s favor.
Am I missing something?
Is Rudy not presenting convincing evidence or are the judged afraid to rule on this explosive case?
*********
My guess is that Democrat oriented courts are putting an impossible burden of proof on plaintiffs challenging a corrupt process, by making the victims of cheating prove that they would have won if there had been no cheating. If there were, say, 500,000 suspiciously dumped ballots that could not be verified as genuine, i.e., no chain of custody, all for Biden, the plaintiff would have to prove that enough of them were forged to change the result.
MSM Headline:
Rudy presents evidence without evidence