Like I said, I think it's a "political question." It's "non-justiciable" in that the issue can never properly be before any court since our constitutional order gives the matter over wholly to some other state body. Here, the issue is the appointment of a states electors to the EC. That is ultimately decided by the state legislatures and so it's not properly before the court.
That's my humble opinion, anyway. Again, I hope I'm wrong.
I get that the States have sway over their election procedure but it cannot be possible they can pass a law regarding procedure and then at a whim change the law in the middle of an election (such as not requiring a postmark on mail in ballots as 1 State did or changing the sensitivity of signature scans resulting in a rejection rate about 10 times lower than in previous yrs.
States can make their own elections laws? Can they pass a law allowing anyone from out of State to vote in the election if they ever visited the State? If not why not.
The citizens of theses States involved in cheating have in fact disenfranchised millions of their own citizens who in a fair election would have seen their LEGAL vote prevail.
So what is the solution? Can the citizens become so enraged by their own State leaders they will vote them out? But they cannot do that can they? Those in power won’t allow it and will change the laws as they see fit to stay in power won’t they?
Tell me if you can how they will be stopped? It seems an armed uprising is the only thing which will work...unless you have another idea.