Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billyboy15; CondoleezzaProtege; Bellagio
Well, I was right about SCOTUS punting but wrong about the grounds.

It wasn't "political question" as I had thought but rather "standing" which strikes me as ridiculous. SCOTUS is saying that TX had no cognizable interest in rampant voter fraud in places like Philly and Detroit that clearly inflicted a false Presidency on the voters of TX. Of course TX had standing. Alito is right about that.

But anyway, SCOTUS punted as expected so we'll never know their opinion about whether this is a non-justiciable "political question."

It's looking grim.

77 posted on 12/11/2020 4:08:53 PM PST by Thilly Thailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Thilly Thailor

Yup. Thanks. I felt this would happen too.

Only a miracle can happen now. If it be the LORD’s will.


78 posted on 12/11/2020 4:11:22 PM PST by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson