, issues he plainly could have raised before the vote occurred
the only issue he could have raised prior to vote was the mailing of ballots. The discrepancies, ‘ballot fixing’, backdating, machines that can’t replicate counts, dead people voting, illegals voting, etc, occurred at, as part of the counting process, or after the vote occurred, so could not be discovered beforehand
bttt
Afterwards is too late because he has already robbed the bank.
Verdict: Not guilty by reason of the court's stupidity in their logic.....
Exactly what I was thinking. He couldn’t have possibly addressed issues that didn’t occur until election night.