Replies

“If you’re going to retry the case in the Senate that’s already been tried in the federal courts it would be hard for me to basically take over the federal courts’ role. But I will listen and we’ll see how it comes out.”

What has been tried in federal court? Every case has been dismissed without hearing the merits.

Not true. There has been four or five cases that evidence was presented. One in the PA circuit was decided by a conservative judge appointed by Trump. He had this to say;

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” U.S. Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote Friday for the unanimous three-judge panel. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

“The Trump Presidential Campaign asserts that Pennsylvania’s 2020 election was unfair. But as lawyer Rudolph Giuliani stressed, the Campaign ‘doesn’t plead fraud. . . … [T]his is not a fraud case.’ … Instead, it objects that Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State and some counties restricted poll watchers and let voters fix technical defects in their mail-in ballots. It offers nothing more,” Bibas added.

https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/led-by-trump-appointee-third-circuit-unanimously-rejects-trumps-election-gripes-in-pennsylvania/

So Giuliani keeps saying they have all this proof of fraud at every press conference or state “hearings”, when he is not under oath. But he has never filed a case in court alleging voter fraud and when asked directly about voter fraud when he is under oath he says it’s not about voter fraud. Why is that? Why does he say one thing at press conferences and another in court?

“What has been tried in federal court? Every case has been dismissed without hearing the merits.”

I agree. There have been no trials, and no evidence has been submitted. The cases have not been heard, merely dismissed. Apparently, virtually no one has ‘standing’ to object to election procedures.