Oh, I dunno. Some Democrat public officials want to excellent law schools, and took Constitutional Law. Some may even have clerked for a member of the Federal judiciary. So those Democrats have quite a bit of knowledge of Constitutional Law.
However, many of them have abandoned the Constitution, and joined the uneducated Marxist rabble who may have been elected to Congress. And they all uphold the validity of the stolen 2020 election, and call those who do not “election deniers”, etc.
Shame on them!!!!
Nooooooo.....
Almost EVERY so-called ‘constitutional law’ expert is trained not in the constitution itself... not in its origins, its principles, its reasoning or its debates during 1787-89. But trained from the decisions made from cases argued on constitutional grounds or invented to have constitutional standing.
Those so-called ‘experts’ are trained in case-law and precedent. Arguments which learned to them an illusion of the constitutions meaning and principles.
Many constitutional contests were blatantly decided/invented from judicial whole cloth by activist jurists which then passed on a corrupt and adulterated understanding of the constitutions limitations and inclusions upon the general governments enumerated powers/authority.
So, no way... NO WAY do the childish and snarky Dems argue from constitutional knowledge. They argue from a script as they always do... from talking points and corrupt decisions making claims the constitution is whatever a supreme court decision or jurist makes it out to be.
That is why the Democrats want to pack the court. With leftist ideologues, demagoguery bloviating jurists. So they can have the constitution mean whatever they want it to mean.
And the so-called ‘experts’ will just follow along as sheep.
That’s why I say the Democrats have ZERO knowledge of constitutional law. Because they DON’T CARE for it’s original intent... they care only that they can interpret it any way they want to suit their agenda.