Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarvinStinson

If the criteria apply to only one man, even though not explicitly named, it is a Bill of Attainder, and unconstitutional.


15 posted on 02/18/2021 4:11:26 PM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625; Chode; DoughtyOne
If the criteria apply to only one man, even though not explicitly named, it is a Bill of Attainder, and unconstitutional.

Dems are in control of the Executive and Legislative branches and don't care about the Constitution. And SCOTUS does not appear inclined to do anything about it.

72 posted on 02/19/2021 7:37:21 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson