He should be a named example to everyone, why intellectual opposition should be listened to and not obscured.
The program had burned through on the two inner o’rings out of the three on previous flights. He wrote a memo telling the top azzholes it was a matter of time till a full failure. Three level risk was the standard, break 2 barriers of the three? You stop and evaluate. NASA gets government money. Kids in Idaho watching Christa McAuillif and the astronauts blow up don’t mean shitz.
Unless Critical Engineering Theory has achieved it’s icy grip on technical discussions within the organization in question, at which time such rational, science-based input will no longer be welcome and can safely be eliminated from the discussion.