Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Incorrigible
What was once old is new again!.................
5 posted on 03/10/2021 9:58:34 AM PST by Red Badger ("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger; rktman; SunkenCiv; Kaslin; TexasGator

SO, the same “US Navy Surface Warfare Dept” that designed the thing, that funded the thing, that fought for the thing, that oversaw its construction, went to sea and “tested” the thing in modest sea state storms.

Then they declared it “satisfactory” ... except for a short roll. Which really means it has terrible landing characteristics and will tire the crew at modest sea states.

Never fear. It is named for an Admiral as bad as the design.


15 posted on 03/10/2021 10:36:01 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (Method, motive, and opportunity: No morals, shear madness and hatred by those who cheat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The biggest difference between the two illustrations is that the Merrimack had thicker armor plate.


25 posted on 03/10/2021 11:13:45 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson