Posted on 03/19/2021 9:55:22 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
A federal judge on Thursday agreed with Ghislaine Maxwell’s request to keep certain details in the criminal case against her secret — finding that information would be too “sensational and impure” to reveal to the public.
US District Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a ruling on redactions that Maxwell had asked for regarding transcripts the government filed under seal last month.
“Those portions of the transcript, which were redacted in the civil matter, concern privacy interests and their disclosure would merely serve to cater to a ‘craving for that which is sensational and impure,’” Nathan wrote in the order.
The judge also granted redactions that prosecutors made when filing the transcript. Prosecutors had argued the redactions were necessary to “protect the integrity” of the investigation into Maxwell and to protect the privacy of third parties.
“The interest in protecting the safety and privacy of those individuals outweighs the presumption of access that attaches to those documents,” Nathan wrote.
Nathan also rejected some objections Maxwell had to the prosecutor’s proposed redactions.
“Though the Defendant contends that some of the information contained in the redactions is public, she furnishes no evidence to that effect,” the decision states.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
This judge clerked for Justice Stevens, worked in the Obama administration, and is a true believer in modern progressivism. Not a chance in hell she is actually concerned about the impure part.
Potassium overload.
Heart attack...........................
Exactly. Redact the names of important politicians and various wealthy individuals.
The banana republic judge redrafted the oath, it now reads "do not tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth but only what I tell you to say"
.
.
.
. Ghislaine Maxwell did not commit suicide.
Well, standards.
I wonder if I could patent the term- neither Maxwell committed suicide!
Is the translation for “too sensational and impure the public” that the judge is in the documents?
Biden: Look judge you’re going to have to say it’s impure or something... Jill and Kamala will tell you what to say.
Judge: Why are you saying that?
Biden: Because half of my staff were involved with those junkets to pedo island. Judge Roberts was there leading a conga line of young boys into the washroom. You get the idea...
Judge: Well, I have to be progressive about this which means...
Biden: Which means you will do exactly as I say! You know why I like progressives?
Judge: No. Why?
Biden: Because they do exactly as I say. I’m the king and have absolute power over them... and I have to thank them for that... but progress means I get my way.
Judge: No... yes... no...
Biden: I’m like the KING of a feudal territory called the U.S. of f@cking A. There are no real elections, no privacy, no rights... just FEAR and a loyalty to me, the head of state. Some frog once said L’etat c’est moi.... That’s me, baby. Yes, it sound regressive, but it’s the best damn thing to happen to me.
Judge: But... but...
Biden: I’m like Kim Ill Jung. Except, I don’t smoke and can beat him in push ups. That fat f@uck can’t touch me! We have a good thing going controlling everything and that’s why you have to listen to me, Kamala and Jill. And if you don’t we’ll have a nice progressive surprise for you....
If we were talking about low level Citizens without public,
positions of authority, I might buy into that, but we aren’t.
These proceedings and documents MUST be open to the public.
But the Grammys are okay, right?
And Public Official, Public Servant, Judges, Lawyers,.. all can’t quite figure out why the American People do NOT Trust or Believe anything they say or do.
Lawyering and Lying are distinctions, not differences.
All Layers are Scum
Most Politicians are lawyers by trade
and All Judges are Lawyers in Drag
But tell us again about how Trump had golden showers fun in Russia with prostitutes - oops that actually never happened. But you can’t bother to tell TRUE facts about these low-lifes?
Makes sense.
Democrats get all the best protections.
Well, I guess the media can go back to watching porn.
Too satanic and evil for the average American to deal with. They should release it anyway. The American people need a good shock to wake them up.
So which one’s the mother? Or does it matter any more?
A judge protecting the public from “impure” sexual material... How about judges step up to protecting children from being exposed to impure sexual material by their “woke” parents and teachers.
"We received more than two dozen reports of individual acts of perversion SO profound and disgusting that decorum prohibits listing them here."
Yes, between Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and Bill Richardson the details are too impure for public view. State secrets must be kept to protect those that rule the peasants.
I predict a long needle with a special cocktail including adrenalin delivered through the sinus to the frontal portion of the brain ... a chemical lobotomy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.