Posted on 03/19/2021 9:55:22 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
A federal judge on Thursday agreed with Ghislaine Maxwell’s request to keep certain details in the criminal case against her secret — finding that information would be too “sensational and impure” to reveal to the public.
US District Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a ruling on redactions that Maxwell had asked for regarding transcripts the government filed under seal last month.
“Those portions of the transcript, which were redacted in the civil matter, concern privacy interests and their disclosure would merely serve to cater to a ‘craving for that which is sensational and impure,’” Nathan wrote in the order.
The judge also granted redactions that prosecutors made when filing the transcript. Prosecutors had argued the redactions were necessary to “protect the integrity” of the investigation into Maxwell and to protect the privacy of third parties.
“The interest in protecting the safety and privacy of those individuals outweighs the presumption of access that attaches to those documents,” Nathan wrote.
Nathan also rejected some objections Maxwell had to the prosecutor’s proposed redactions.
“Though the Defendant contends that some of the information contained in the redactions is public, she furnishes no evidence to that effect,” the decision states.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
p
Who is the father would be more appropriate. One thing for sure, it is not the cuck with her. They could be as were Barky and Big Mike’s two. loaners from someone unknown.
Put the words of the transcript into a rap song and it will win a Grammy award.
Just so long as she doen’t go baoting like her father.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/mystery-maxwell-s-death-6107041.html
I can’t think of one reason why anyone should protect that evil slut...
Just how does the general public know for sure the data is “impure?”
I have a hard time finding “impure” in the criminal statutes.
At this point, let’s get all the dirty laundry out on the table and expose it to the cleansing light of day and a good thorough scrubbing in soapy water.
What can be sensational or impure in a nation that allows human trafficking and allows the unborn to be murdered in abortion mills?
Amen to that.
Thanks for the ping.
They won’t show it because it’s got TONS of DEMOCRATS being IMPURE!
When Disney started having gay days, there was nothing too sensitive for the public.
IOW, the judge is running cover for the who’s who.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.