[BenLurkin]

“describing Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, the suspected gunman in Monday’s Colorado supermarket shooting, as a “white Christian terrorist” does not violate the social network’s misinformation policies”

Unbelievable.

[Gene Eric]

>> Unbelievable.

Preferable consistency.

[erkelly]

Couldn’t he, at least be called, a BACKSLIDDEN terrorist Christian. Personally, I have never heard terrorism preached in the pulpit, unless “turn the other cheek” is a form of terrorism.

[Mom MD]

What if I call him a syrian muslim terrorist? Is telling the truth ok?

[Kevmo]

Uhh, “unbelievable” does not describe it well enough. Unffukkenbelievable is more like it.

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

Twitter is THE “Leftist Marxist media terrorist” of the internet. It should be dismantled as a national security risk and for promoting “terrorism denial disinformation” postings that sound like Red Chinese and Russian propaganda.

[MikeSteelBe]

“describing Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, the suspected gunman in Monday’s Colorado supermarket shooting, as a “white Christian terrorist” does not violate the social network’s misinformation policies”

Now can we call the Atlanta shooter a Muslim terrorist?

[personalaccts]

how about a non-christian non white terrorist?

[Shery]

Nothing Christian about him, but the facts don’t count!

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

Yet when I compared Norman Bates(PSYCHO) and Ed Gein(a real psycho) to a tranny who whacks off body parts to become a woman I got 30 days in the Facebook Jail.

[allwrong57]

It’s partially true. He’s a terrorist, just a middle eastern muslim terrorist.