Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem Rep. Schakowsky: ‘We’re Going to Regulate’ Tech Companies, and There Must Be ‘Limitations’ on User Content
Breitbart ^ | 03/25/2021 | Ian Hanchett

Posted on 03/26/2021 5:52:18 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: ChicagoConservative27

Yeay!!!

Just in time for the Trump / Lindell Social media platform!!!


21 posted on 03/26/2021 7:48:07 AM PDT by TheElectionWasStolen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Sounds like Chairwoman Jan Schakowsky didn’t receive a donation from the big tech companies yet and not happy about it.


22 posted on 03/26/2021 9:08:41 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: fuzzylogic
I agree they are a monopoly and should be broken up. That is not the issue here.

My problem is the Rethuglicans complaining about free speech while continuing to use the platforms that are censoring them.

Build a platform, spend money on infrastructure so you can't be "deplatformed" and use that platform exclusively.

If I built a platform, I would have the right to kick you off if you were being an asshole. That would be my right. Free Speech does not require me to give you a microphone and a podium.

24 posted on 03/26/2021 11:38:25 AM PDT by nonliberal (Caput gerat lupinum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission
1. Parler is garbage. They get hacked, half the time the app doesn't work and they have been kicked off their platform because they were too stupid to spend money on infrastructure.

2. Yes. They are a monopoly and should be broken up. On that, we agree.

3. That being said, it's not my platform. I choose not to use social media. At all. That is my choice to keep from funding more of those who despise me. If you are concerned about getting censored, buy some politicians and build your own platform.

25 posted on 03/26/2021 11:43:27 AM PDT by nonliberal (Caput gerat lupinum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: semimojo
Great news! You might be getting that government regulation you’ve been wanting.

You are still trying to put your words into my mouth. I don't want any sort of regulation, but since our society has gone "one flew over the cuckoo nest", I can laugh with glee as leftist propaganda agents get their own book of rules forced down their own throats.

26 posted on 03/26/2021 3:50:14 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nonliberal
The problem I have here is that “conservatives” want to ensure free speech on SOMEONE ELSE’S PLATFORM. Make your own or get off social media.

No. False thinking. When it's a billion users big, it is no longer the sole property of anyone, it is a defacto public resource.

Anything that is used by millions of people to communicate with other members of the public is a public resource, and must be regarded as a public resource, regardless of how it was began and who created it.

27 posted on 03/26/2021 3:53:11 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Freedom of the press does not include the freedom to use someone else’s press without their consent.

No. Comparing a billion user mass communications infrastructure of now critical importance to a "press" is a f***ing lie.

My position is simple. If you are a massive communications system, and you restrict freedom of speech, you need to be destroyed by any means possible.

If you deny the rights of the public, you must be denied access to the public. You should not be allowed to have members of the public use your communications infrastructure.

The public has rights that "private" companies cannot take away.

28 posted on 03/26/2021 3:58:37 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

At what scale is Constitutionally protected “press” no longer Constitutionally protected “press”?
The answer is in the absurdity of the question, to wit “when is X not X?”.


29 posted on 03/26/2021 4:31:09 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The claim of consensus is the first refuge of scoundrels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

You are literally, right now, looking at a “press” capable of instantly delivering content worldwide to billions of potential readers. Nothing is stopping you but your own resolvable ignorance. Nobody is censoring your content published on your own press. Nobody is stopping a willing audience. Getting that audience to request your content, well, that’s your problem.


30 posted on 03/26/2021 4:45:55 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The claim of consensus is the first refuge of scoundrels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Alex Jones was the “canary in the coal mine”, first to get kicked off the major presses.
Yet here he is, easily accessible: https://www.infowars.com/show/the-alex-jones-show/
What’s the problem?


31 posted on 03/26/2021 4:55:09 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The claim of consensus is the first refuge of scoundrels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nonliberal

“That being said, it’s not my platform. I choose not to use social media. At all.”

Yet here you are typing away! (And redirecting the thread!)

“That is my choice to keep from funding more of those who despise me. If you are concerned about getting censored, buy some politicians and build your own platform.”

There...You put words in my mouth and despise me with your post. How much respect do you have for sponsor of this site when you use the language you used in post 23?


32 posted on 03/26/2021 8:03:56 PM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
At what scale is Constitutionally protected “press” no longer Constitutionally protected “press”?

It's not a press. It's a telephone system.

Since when did the telephone company have a right to control what the public said to each other?

33 posted on 03/27/2021 1:14:54 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
You are literally, right now, looking at a “press” capable of instantly delivering content worldwide to billions of potential readers.

It's not a press. It does not write columns meant for publication. It controls what other people say to each other. It is a telephone system, not a newspaper.

It is also a deadly threat to freedom if it is allowed to control public speech.

34 posted on 03/27/2021 1:17:06 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
What’s the problem?

An audience of millions compared to an audience of thousands. Did the public ask for this? Or did someone impose this on the public against their will?

35 posted on 03/27/2021 1:18:13 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

And again, on that I agree with you. Bust them up. Failure to trust bust Silicon Valley was a major fail for the Trump administration as it would have done the country a great service.


36 posted on 03/29/2021 6:31:30 AM PDT by nonliberal (Caput gerat lupinum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson