Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AZJeep
From the Hiroshima studies, a fit line was created to correlate radiation dosage to cancer. That was done using extreme levels of radiation. Extrapolating this line, one gets some cancer risk even for infinitesimally small doses of radiation. However that's proven wrong many times.

I was one of those in charge of a “big city” hazmat team for quite a few years. It was my job to evaluate the risks to my crews and the public from various situations that we encountered and also help plan for possible challenges in the future.

If the past year has taught us anything... it has illustrated how shockingly poor the public, politicians, bureaucrats and the media are at calculating any type of meaningful risk assessment. All the media has to do is throw around a few triggering words like radiation, acid, toxins, etc... and they can manipulate the public and politicians into an artificial panic for fun and profit.

Containers made to hold "hazardous materials" often fail and persons such as myself are called on to evaluate what the likely consequences will be, and what actions shoud be taken to stabilize the situation. It is just a fact of life in modern society.

49 posted on 04/03/2021 9:22:49 PM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: fireman15

Yes.
Lot of hazardous materials are really not that hazardous.
Lot of it is media hype. Plus, the people who know are often safeguarding to ridiculous levels, just to be covered from lawsuits.
We are overprotected.


59 posted on 04/04/2021 5:10:50 AM PDT by AZJeep (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0AHQkryIIs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson