To: Publius; Jacquerie
To: cotton1706
Got nothing to lose at this point. I hope it happens.
3 posted on
04/20/2021 5:18:27 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
("I see you did something -- why you so racist?")
To: cotton1706
Mark Levin will have something worth listening to regarding this vote, and the move towards a “Convention of the States”.
7 posted on
04/20/2021 5:29:39 PM PDT by
Richard Axtell
(President Asterisk is an ass to risk the economy and rights of all Americans.)
To: cotton1706
Considering what we have seen with the manipulation of elections, I am scared to death of a new Constitutional Convention and the subsequent voting.
13 posted on
04/20/2021 5:33:45 PM PDT by
elpadre
( )
To: cotton1706
...and the Constitution requires two-thirds of states, or 34, to call for the convention.That's bad math. Two-thirds of 57 is 38, not 34.
14 posted on
04/20/2021 5:35:20 PM PDT by
Veggie Todd
(Religion. It's like a History class. Without the facts. )
To: cotton1706
...could remove amendments that ended slavery and secured African American voting rights and citizenship. It does much more than that. It gives the Federal Government the power to Legislate Cosmic law. Whatever some politicians or Judge feels should be made equal. This is what has effectively gutted the 10th Amendment. The Income Tax and removing State House's from selecting Senators made this even worse. Removing those changes would go a long ways towards bringing back American liberty.
15 posted on
04/20/2021 5:38:50 PM PDT by
Nateman
(Keep Liberty Alive! Article V!)
To: cotton1706
The only issue on the agenda should be to approve a mechanism for states to leave the union.
To: cotton1706
SO you take a constitution that was written by by a bunch of wise and generally moral people. Then you open it up to a bunch of communists, socialists, and ignorant Americans.
What could go wrong.
21 posted on
04/20/2021 6:00:22 PM PDT by
Revel
To: cotton1706
New states may only be admitted by two thirds of the states voting for approval.
29 posted on
04/20/2021 6:22:26 PM PDT by
McGavin999
(biden is not my president )
To: cotton1706
What for???
Unless it is to remove the 16th & 17th & 19th & the 20th modified...
Otherwise it is a total waste of time that will be dominated by Soros funded politicians... Sayonara to the Constitution altogether...
30 posted on
04/20/2021 6:24:03 PM PDT by
SuperLuminal
(Where are T&T now that we desperately need them?)
To: cotton1706
31 posted on
04/20/2021 6:25:34 PM PDT by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. The Dhimmicraps are ALL Traitors. All of them.)
To: cotton1706
I don't know... The stinking lawyers in DC won't obey the laws on the books now.. How can we be so sure they would follow new ones.. It seems anytime they don't like a law, they just ignore it..
33 posted on
04/20/2021 6:39:58 PM PDT by
unread
(Joe....it's not the bill of needs....it's the bill of rights.)
To: cotton1706
YES!!!!
See tagline. And ignore the birchers who throw up chaff but won’t actually defend their views. They are brainwashed.
To: cotton1706
A Con-Con, despite what Levin says, will be a HUGE mistake!
43 posted on
04/20/2021 7:27:26 PM PDT by
Taxman
(SAVE AMERICA!)
To: cotton1706
It’s nice that some people are still pretending we have an operative Constitution, you know that thing, the thing we always talk about, you know the thing.......
.....that both parties abrogated when they swore in the Kenyan from Indonesia.
44 posted on
04/20/2021 7:28:39 PM PDT by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents)(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
To: cotton1706
62 posted on
04/20/2021 11:50:47 PM PDT by
Herakles
(Diversity is applied Marxism!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson