I dunno. I generally think it’s a bad idea, with unintended consequences. Just take the Amendments you want added to the state houses one by one. Opening up a Convention could lead to all kinds of nonsense.
That's not how Article V works. Either Congress or an Article V Convention proposes an amendment. That States can vote on whether to ratify only what has been proposed.
***
The amendatory process under Article V consists of three steps: Proposal, Disposal, and Ratification.
Proposal:
There are two ways to propose an amendment to the Constitution.
Article V gives Congress and an Amendments Convention exactly the same power to propose amendments, no more and no less.
Disposal:
Once Congress, or an Amendments Convention, proposes amendments, Congress must decide whether the states will ratify by the:
The State Ratifying Convention Method has only been used twice: once to ratify the Constitution, and once to ratify the 21st Amendment repealing Prohibition.
Ratification:
Depending upon which ratification method is chosen by Congress, either the state legislatures vote up-or-down on the proposed amendment, or the voters elect a state ratifying convention to vote up-or-down. If three fourths of the states vote to ratify, the amendment becomes part of the Constitution.
Forbidden Subjects:
Article V contains two explicitly forbidden subjects and one implicitly forbidden subject.
Explicitly forbidden:
Implicitly forbidden:
Reference works:
Proposing Constitutional Amendments by a Convention of the States: A Handbook for State Lawmakers
State Initiation of Constitutional Amendments: A Guide for Lawyers and Legislative Drafters
“...take the Amendments you want added to the state houses one by one...”
-
That is exactly what an Article V Convention of the States does.
Do not hold your breath while the U.S. Senate proposes an amendment
to repeal the 17th Amendment.
You have no idea what this is about, do you?