Liz Propped him up, wonder why.
Posted on 06/05/2021 2:21:06 PM PDT by conservative98
An epidemiologist and professor at the University of Stanford said Friday that Dr. Anthony Fauci’s credibility "is entirely shot" after revelations from his emails show a reversal on the subject of mask wearing to prevent COVID-19.
"I think he's been all over the place on masks," Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of medicine at Stanford said on "The Ingraham Angle." "There are emails you can find in the treasure trove of emails that have been released where he acknowledged the virus has been aerosolized -- well the cloth masks people have been recommending, they're not particular[ly] effective against aerosolized viruses.
"I really don't understand his back and forth and his answer made absolutely no sense," he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I didn’t know that he had any to begin with.
A trove of Fauci’s emails were released via Freedom of Information Act requests this week, which include a February email in which he advised someone not to wear a mask to the airport.
“Masks are really for infected people to prevent them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection. The typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through the material,” he said, in one of the emails obtained by BuzzFeed News. “It might, however, provide some slight benefit in keep out gross droplets if someone coughs or sneezes on you. I do not recommend that you wear a mask, particularly since you are going to a vey (sic) low risk location.”
‘The Five’ react to Biden’s ongoing support of Dr. FauciVideo
Fauci and other experts later reversed their stances, and mask mandates became common across much of America throughout 2020 and into 2021. Fauci has defended himself, saying his position has changed as the science has changed.
“If we knew then that a substantial amount of transmission was asymptomatic people, if we knew then that the data show that masks outside of a hospital setting actually do work when we didn’t know it then, of course people would have done it, that’s so obvious,” he said on CNN.
But Bhattacharya was skeptical, saying that the facts did not change “a ton.”
“Yes you should change your mind when the science changes, what is that science that changed that convinced him that masks are the most effective way?” he asked.
“The CDC Director Robert Redfield said masks were more effective than vaccines and Dr. Fauci did not contradict him when Dr. Scott Atlas said that was nonsense, which it was,” he said.
“I think his credibility is entirely shot,” he added.
Data please?
A number of younger Stanford professors were on top of it early, actually using science to show the draconian measures were over the top and not necessary.
They were ignored.
Our Overlords change their edicts on an almost daily basis, and if you question those edicts you will be cancelled.
Fauci is a mental lightweight....in way over his head.
He is tasked with fighting viral infections, and pays lip-service to that goal, but he flirts with the demon by playing at weaponization.
For the same reasons the media and the Democrats have none. You can’t just make stuff up and expect to be believed.
That’s impressive! Hard to shoot at a target that small and hit it.
Daily Mail ^Posted on 5/23/2021, 12:22:54 PM by algore
Dr Anthony Fauci questioned the origins of COVID-19 at a May 11 PolitiFact event
Asked if he's 'still confident it developed naturally', Fauci said: 'No, actually'
'I think we should continue to investigate what went on in China until we continue to find out to the best of our ability what happened,' he said
Fauci's comments came after he clashed with Sen Rand Paul on the topic at a Senate hearing earlier this month In front of the Senate Fauci said he could not rule out the possibility that COVID-19 leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology
On Thursday the White House renewed calls for an 'independent, transparent investigation' into the origins of the virus.
It followed a report from Republicans which found 'significant circumstantial evidence' of a lab leak.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk …
It’s not the University of Stanford. It’s the “Leland Stanford Junior University,” named in honor of the son of Leland and Jane Stanford, who died in his teens.
What was Tony Fauxci doing in the 70s and 80s?
DOD appropriations hearings for 1970
US Senate library – 91st Congress , 1st session.
Subcommittee Chairman – George H, Mahon ( Texas )
Research , development , test and evaluation
DARPA + Defense Research and Engineering
July 1, 1969
In 1969 D.O.D. requested and got $ 10 Million to ” explore ” possibilities.
”Biologists believe within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENT , an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.” Then we got A.I.D.S. and ‘gain of function’ was born. (”Behold A Pale Horse” William Cooper) A copy of the book was sent to ALL Reps. and Senators when published in 1991-92, so yes, they knew.
Also, here’s an article from 1989 about his lies and his manipulation of data in order to get rich off of AZT...looks like NOTHING has changed!!
https://www.spin.com/featured/aids-and-the-azt-scandal-spin-1989-feature-sins-of-omission/
Thank you.
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.