Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer

Thanks I looked through it. Keep in mind the 1% mortality includes many people who are treated with those protocols. Without treatments, last April, we had almost 7% mortality. But part of that higher mortality was higher risk demographics getting hit first. Also they actually killed people using ventilators.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The bulk of the killing had already been completed while restraining the public from accessing medications.

The PCR test does not identify the Covid virus or the illness, so we don’t know what mix of persons are in the death statistics - I’ve seen articles saying “Hmmmm....maybe we ‘missed’ pneumonia”.

Then the death stats were inflated other ways - like forcing Covid-19 patients into nursing homes.

Dr. Yeadon formerly of Pfizer says the stats are in reality, similar to annual flu.


16 posted on 06/10/2021 6:58:43 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote
Dr. Yeadon formerly of Pfizer says the stats are in reality, similar to annual flu.

Here are the numbers as best I can guess. We had about 1/3 of Americans infected last year. There were 511,000 more deaths than 2019, but many were from hospitals shut down, etc. So say 200,000 from COVID (dying from something else, but they died early due to COVID), out the 500,000 increased deaths.

Tnat means 0.24% infection mortality rate. That's about double what a bad flu does.

18 posted on 06/10/2021 7:15:22 PM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson