Posted on 07/12/2021 5:11:22 AM PDT by Kaslin
If there has been anything of value coming from the one-two gut punch of the Chinese Communist Party's COVID-19 virus and the Great Reset global oligarchs' use of that virus to remake the world in their lasting favor, it is that more Americans have been awakened to three truths: (1) governments lie to their citizens all the time; (2) the media lie to the public all the time; and (3) because science has become a politically funded tool of government, scientists lie about their research all the time.
On Friday, Chief Politburo Medical Mandater and Flip-Flopper Anthony Fauci proved that truth trifecta yet again by going on CNN and contradicting Pfizer's scientific conclusions on the efficacy of its own vaccine. Pfizer and BioNTech, two companies responsible for one of the three vaccines approved for emergency use in the United States, released a statement on Thursday touting their progress on a third "booster" shot that they plan to submit to the Food and Drug Administration and other government authorities for approval in the coming weeks. Their self-congratulatory announcement seemed geared toward neutering recently published medical research from Israel's Ministry of Health that shows that the effectiveness of Pfizer's vaccine at preventing infection and life-threatening symptoms drops precipitously from 94.5% to 64% after only six months. In fact, Pfizer and BioNTech highlighted the Israeli medical research as matching their own in-house laboratory findings on the diminished effectiveness of their two-shot vaccine treatment and used these combined results to argue for the necessity of a future third jab.
That's a newsworthy story. The Pfizer vaccine's usefulness drops sharply in a few short months, and the companies behind its creation believe that a third shot is necessary. How did U.S. government scientists respond to this release of information? Within a few hours,
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I am really, really, really tired of this little gas-bag and Democrat/Communist Fauci.
SCIENCE ISN'T MATH.
It never was.
And it sure isn't now.
Remember how science said ulcers were induced chiefly by stress or spicy food? It turns out, they are induced chiefly by bacteria. Whoops.
The history of science is littered with "no wait....that's wrong...THIS is right..." going through the rinse and repeat cycle endlessly.
And that's ok. Inquiry and challenge and "being a science heretic" is, in many ways, how mankind learns more and can fix more problems.
But science isn't math. Your checking account balance is the sum of deposits less sum of withdrawals. Always. Forever.
The problem arises when people try to equate science with math...usually they call it "settled science." And, to be sure, robust inquiry and disciplined application of the scientific method usually gives you clear and distinct results. Then, science is settled...until we get new data or better techniques, and then we get "wait a minute..".
For example, there was a most excellent article posted on how "settled science" wasn't so settled, wherein:
seems that Earth has been misplaced. According to a new map of the Milky Way galaxy, the Solar System's position isn't where we thought it was. Not only is it closer to the galactic centre - and the supermassive hole therein, Sagittarius A* - it's orbiting at a faster clip.
It further noted other "errors" in SCIENCE:
A good recent example of this is the red giant star Betelgeuse, which turned out to be closer to Earth than previous measurements suggested. This means that it's neither as large nor as bright as we thought. Another is the object CK Vulpeculae, a star that exploded 350 years ago. It's actually much farther away, which means that the explosion was brighter and more energetic, and requires a new explanation, since previous analyses were performed under the assumption it was relatively low energy
What we've seen during the entire pandemic is Certain Powers working overtime to suppress assiduous inquiry and, instead, crank out a bunch of "science" and act like it is math..."the wonderfullness of these shots released under EUAs is as certain as 1+1=2."
Um, no. Math is math. Science is science. The two aren't equal.
In the interest of full disclosure, my "science isn't math" quote came from a recent post on social sciences, that featured this brilliant give and take involving a Harvard faculty member critical of Charles Murray from the original article, that is worth reprinting - it is with regard to the "certainty of SCIENCE":
"so why should we let someone teach social science that we know to be wrong in our social science courses?"
Because it is possible that you are wrong.
Science is not mathematics. Newtonian physics was wrong. And social science is a further three rungs down in certainty from science.
Your level of certainty and arrogance about what can be said, and probably thought, smacks of religion, and not science. This is a political religion that permeates academia at the moment. And which I am fairly sure you will swear does not infect you, while the rest of us can see the symptoms quite plainly.
Only religions ban heretics from speaking because of the wrong-think they might cause. Real science loves a good heretic. In fact, honestly, the entire goal of science is to be a heretic. To have an idea that no other person ever had. Science is the pretty much the antithesis of your thought-police approach.
And most of academia used to be the antithesis of your thought police approach as well, until the religion of leftism took it over, with the direct help of people like you.
Please note - per Renfrew, "Newtonian physics wasn’t wrong, but it was incomplete. That is an important distinction. Newton’s calculations worked fine (and still do) 99% of the time, but over time we found more an more exceptions. Almost all of those exceptions were cleaned up by Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity, but we still have other exceptions that prove those theories are not complete."
#MeToo. /s
I’m also tiring of normally intelligent people missing the glaring fact that nuanced language is dangerous when it promotes propaganda.
I refer to the author’s use of the word ‘approved’.
NONE of these serums are ‘approved’ by the FDA: They are permissive to be injected only under Emergency Use Authorizations.
Preaching to the choir I’m sure, but just stating my observations in the clear since there seems to be an increasing (improper) use of reckless language when (properly) denigrating the government and Fauxi himself.
It’s a notable contradiction.
thanks for posting. Very well written
No, not always, on any of the three. Only since the worthless collectivists took over. Root them out and things will improve across the board.
Lies, lies & more lies .....
Dr. Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance offered the following assessment:
“Daszak reiterated that, until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Full interview with Dr. David Martin regarding patents for held LONG before the “pandemic” for ‘virus’, ‘vaccines’, etc.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lIUGg5dXHxiQ/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Vaccine Makers Claim COVID Shots Are ‘95% Effective’ — But What Does That Mean?
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3975209/posts
The damage has been done. The Pfizer CEO says his vaccine is only really good for a few months and a third is necessary. Somebody hesitant about being vaccinated likely isn’t going to want to get the Pfizer jabs after hearing that.
I've posted this a few times but, before getting zotted/meet death with nasty, big, pointy teeth, I'll leave it alone for a while.
lol A Carl Spackler reference AND a tip to the foul rodents all in one post!
Why would ANYONE zot a poster like you?
NI!
My understanding of viruses is that an infection creates antibodies to deal with short term in case of reinfection. But the T-cells and B-cells in blood-creating bone marrow keep the master for making antibodies as necessary.
I have not read of any testing of these blood cells to determine the extent of ‘immunity’ of a given virus. Part of the problem is there is no single antibody for CoVID19 available for comparison and testing. The ‘test’ is looking for DNA samples from a pool of cells that contain elements common to CoVID, as well as other, ‘undefined’ viruses.
There are antibody models for measles, which are easy to test for, for example.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.