Posted on 07/21/2021 2:40:09 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
If you ever held any hope that the House select committee on the January 6 US Capitol riot might produce a report that would help us understand what happened in the lead-up to that day and, in so doing, provide us avenues to keeping it from happening again, you should give up on those hopes now.
The reason? Speaker Nancy Pelosi's decision Wednesday to reject two of the five nominees -- Jim Jordan of Ohio and Jim Banks of Indiana -- put forward by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy to serve on the panel.......
This isn't true, of course. There's zero evidence that suggests Pelosi or Democrats did anything wrong in advance of or during the January 6 riot, which was incited by former President Donald Trump. But Pelosi has handed Republicans a golden issue to rev up their base in advance of the 2022 midterms -- and you can bet they will use it.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
At least CNN figured Nancy screwed up.
Ia 1/6 the ratio of Republicans to Democrats on the panel?
Nancy better watch her temperature she’ll end up with Dementia
Cillizza is one of the slimiest of the Ministry of Propaganda operatives.
Either way it was never going to be anything but a shit show.
1/6 = Jan 6.
Other than those thousands of hours of videos she won't let us see.
So what IS the ratio of Republicans? less than 1/6?
Where will Nancy get the money for her committee ? Pull it out of her usual place ?
“Cillizza is one of the slimiest of the Ministry of Propaganda operatives.”
Isn’t he the snowflake who got the vapors when he shot a .223, an event so traumatic to him that he had to seek the comfort of the fainting couch?
Using Sleaze-a is hilarious. This dude is first on CNN's cut list.
"Both men would have, at every turn, sought to turn the tables on Democrats -- using the platform provided by the committee to push debunked claims about Antifa's involvement in the Capitol riot, questioning Democratic leadership's readiness for just such an attack and trying to broaden the committee's mandate to cover the Black Lives Matter protests of summer 2020."
As Sleaze-a knows, Nancy's exposure is much deeper than that, and does not want this Committee anywhere near the cameras.
What they could have done, what they should have done, is point out that 30+ members of Nancy's USCP are under indictment or investigation for colluding with the tourists; or how about the inexplicable subsequent suicides of USCP veteran Officers Howie Liebengood and Jeffrey Smith; or better yet, how about Representative Jim Jordan calling Lt. Michael Byrd to testify!
Meanwhile, note that Sleaze-a had to correct his own poorly-written story. Maybe he was busy running out the center field exit at the Nationals after shitting his pants lofl...
"CORRECTION: A previous version of this story misstated in one instance how Pelosi responded to the nominations of Reps. Jim Jordan and Jim Banks to serve on the select committee; she rejected them."
No, it’s the fraction of Trump’s IQ represented by the sum of the IQs of all the Democrat members.
All that 4-D Chess I suppose
“There’s zero evidence that suggests Pelosi or Democrats did anything wrong in advance of or during the January 6 riot”
Why did Pelosi and Bowser decline the request for reinforcements asked for by the capitol police? What role did the FBI have in instigating the riot? Democrat militias, Antifa and BLM, were caught on tape breaching the capitol, escalating violence as they do in all riots. So not zero evidence.
Sleazy gives away the game before it begins.
who authorized the doors to be opened?
Where’s Lucy and that damn football?! Every time people think the DEMs are behind the eight-ball, they somehow manage to come out ahead way more times than not.
The chances of Pelozi’s 1/6 committee mattering are smaller than the chances of dying from covid.
Except that "engineering a stolen election" thingy.
This was a forgone conclusion that this was going to be a blue ribbon panel with a whole lot of folks wearing kabuki masks dressed up for a cotillion dance for woke debutantes.
The Wikipedia entry on Hillary Clinton’s accomplishments will tell more truth than the conclusions from the house 1/6 investigation.
Impeachment 3. What to name the third chapter in this trilogy?
The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest
Mad Maxine: Beyond Thunderdome
Naked Fraud 33-1/3
Revenge of the Myth
Impeach Hard With a Vengeance
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Idiot Dems and the Last Crusade
The Trump Ultimatum
Lord of the Tweets: Return of the King
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.