Then you should be able to disprove it.
“Then you should be able to disprove it.”
Isn’t that what Qtards do?
Make utterly outlandish charges then argue they cannot be disproved.
While arguing the world to be flat, they would ask: How do you know? Have YOU been to outer space? And if so, how do you know it wasn’t just a government mind control experiment?
You cannot prove the world is not flat!
“Then you should be able to disprove it.”
Well, the problem is ... there’s no “it” to disprove.
Lots of rhetoric, speculation, and assertions - but no actual _evidence_.
Don’t get me wrong, I was having a WTF moment before 10pm on Election Day, obviously cheating was going into high gear (major metro area announced halt to counting, to resume next morning) and there’s plenty of “well that ain’t right” piling up since. Stolen election? yeah probably.
We’ve heard much of audits and recounts, but no objective details released - at least, no “well there it is” objective facts. No “well there’s 437 registered voters in this precinct and 13,273 of them voted for Joe”. No “these 1372 voters did, in fact, vote early and often”. Lots of “devastating evidence coming soon!” ... and it’s August now.
Remember, good cheating doesn’t leave evidence proving it happened. Yeah, a whole lotta archived ballots got shredded - they’re gone. Manual “naw, he _really_ wanted to vote for Joe” digital record changes happened - without a trail. If there was cheating, it only need be in a few statistically tenuous areas easily bumped back over the line with some plausible deniability.
Yeah, I’d like to disprove it.
Er ... what “it” exactly?