It will be interesting to see what the results are. There N size is small only 100 patients and they won’t conclude the study till September. Contrast that to the tens of thousands who have had monoclonal antibodies treatment in three phases of clinical trials and real world use by three different makers of monoclonal antibodies the results of those are in the link I provided.
So an N of 100 vs an N of tens if thousands. If I was sick I know which one I would choose. It’s a no brainer the antibodies were isolated and cloned based on their ability to stop the replication of covid they are what nature uses in our own bodies to fight and kill virus the debate is never will they work it’s which ones to isolate and clone that are the most effective at killing the bug. Our body can make 200+ types of antibodies only a few are the killer kind these treatments are isolated and cloned killer antibodies of course they work otherwise our bodies would fail against the covid and it’s death rate would be near 100%. If one is not a poor the obvious choice is cloned antibodies they will work. Why do you think they rushed them to Trump he got well in 48 hours even with at least two comobidities. The best doctors in the world didn’t give the most important man in the world horse wormer they gave him cloned antibodies it’s little surprise why.
I’ve nothing against MAB, but that is strictly an in hospital treatment. We need to deploy an array of weapons against Covid and that includes simple administered-at-home treatments such as Ivermectin.
As a real world example, Mexico City began a simple regimen where anyone who tested pottivie for Covid, presuming symptoms where not immediately severe enough to warrant hospitalization, was sent home with a small treatment kit of Ivermectin. There was over a 50% reduction in the need for hospitalization in the group that received Ivermectin.
https://principia-scientific.com/covid-deaths-plunge-after-mexico-city-introduces-ivermectin/