That's better immunity than the terminator "vaccines" provide.
Posted on 08/29/2021 10:52:35 AM PDT by bgill
Smokers typically pay higher insurance rates so it stand to reason that people who refuse to get a COVID shot might see their coverage costs increase. However, staff at the Washington State Office of the Insurance Commissioner said that is not legal and they want to hear from people if it happens.
“An unvaccinated person cannot be charged more than a vaccinated person," said Steve Valandra, the deputy commissioner for public affairs with the Insurance Commission. "It's just not allowed."
However, self-insured companies are exempt from this, and are not subject to regulation by the state insurance commissioner. Delta Air Lines is one such company that has since announced a $200 monthly surcharge and weekly testing for employees who refuse to get the COVID shot.
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsaustin.com ...
How much are the comorbidities caused by the vax costing?
Those who survived the Fauci/China virus have better protection than those who took the shots.
Pushing that jab.
Still not getting it.
If it is based on an actuarial, then I want my naturally immune discount.
That's better immunity than the terminator "vaccines" provide.
What a pant load.
Will sodomites pay higher rates? How about the grossly obese? Cannabis users?
Wonder if in the future there happen to be unknowable costly side effects of the treatments if they private insurers will flip flop.
They don’t care about whether you’re immune or not.
They want you vaxxed so bad that they are trying everything in their power to accomplish that.
Still not getting it because anything they want me to do that bad is most certainly something I do not want to do.
Interesting the term, “Likely” appeared several times at the check box.
People I don’t trust wanting me to do stuff, the harder they try the more me not trusting them becomes a factor.
Why aren’t the poofters dying in large numbers since they tend to have those underlying conditions that actually make CV19 lethal? Especially if they’re the bug chaser variant?
Total horse crap article. Rat bastard purposefully does not print the whole of the subject. The wordplay means they include those who have had covid but are “unvaccinated” and thus falsely inflate the risk because they cannot allow the scientific and medical fact of natural immunity to interfere with their embracing of the government getting to dictate all terms to you. Of course not when it comes to murdering the child inside you but on vaccines...yes they get to tell you.
War is coming because of their mindset.
If they try that with me, I will sue. F**K these tyrants. I have drawn my line.
Trust is getting harder and harder to come by these days.
So by that logic tobacco users, marijuana users, homosexuals, and Mexican illegal aliens will need to pay much higher premiums as well, since these choices result in much higher than average medical care expenses...
Those who take the jab and suffer adverse events should pay higher premiums.
The vaccinated, who suffer breakthrough infections, should share the burden by paying higher premiums. (The leaky vaccine has major responsibility for viral variants according to Dr. Malone)
Tobacco users do pay a higher premium now. It’s in obumbercare.
Frankly, I stopped trusting the federal government after any fashion long ago.
All the lotteries, and prizes.
A free bag of fries to alter your DNA
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.