I could find no studies for adverse affects or effects from wearing a seat belt but, I can look at the givernment Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System https://vaers.hhs.gov/
Here we can see thousands of deaths attributed to these vaccines and hundreds of thousands more who have injured.
The seat belt analogy is for a retarded intellect and way to easy to swat down...
A seat belt isn’t installed as part of your body forever.
You put a seatbelt around you while you drive, then you take it OFF when you choose.
These jabs are in you permanently and they are chemicals no one is willing to tell you exactly what’s in them..
Something is wrong with your cut and paste.
If they want to use a collectivist argument for the vaccine, we can use a collectivist argument against abortion.
There are 70-million missing Americans who could be paying for my Social Security because of abortion-on-demand.
Impeach 46.
From the comments and where I was thinking anyway:
“The seatbelt equivalence is dumb. We know that one of the most dangerous things you can do is drive a car. And serious life altering injuries can occur at relatively low speeds. This is a scientific fact. But COVID has a 98 or 99 percent recovery rate. Furthermore, if you drill deeper into the demographics of those that die, the recovery rate gets better when you take comorbidity’s and age into account. So if you’re healthy and under 65 years old, getting a vaccine is more akin to wearing a seatbelt while you’re sitting on the couch at home watching Netflix.”
Simple answer. Seatbelt laws are ALSO evil and pointless. there was a time when we didn’t have them or need them. and yes people died, but the better answer was always, education and training, not coercion.
Well now that you mention it...there probably shouldn’t be seatbelt requirements either.
The seat belt requirement was established as a result of lobbying
by the auto insurance companies to reduce their outlays of payments
on injuries that were incurred in automobile accidents.
The collective retarded intellect at National Review has still never repudiated their “Against Trump” cover, except for Glenn Beck that I am aware.
I wonder if there is any way a poster would be able to remove the double and triple text in their contribution to the board.
Not doing so makes it difficult and annoying to read.
I wonder if there is any way a poster would be able to remove the double and triple text in their contribution to the board.
Not doing so makes it difficult and annoying to read.
I wonder if there is any way a poster would be able to remove the double and triple text in their contribution to the board.
Not doing so makes it difficult and annoying to read.
There is no huge difference, loss of freedom is loss of freedom.
If you are not driving, you do not need to wear a seat belt. This vaccine order forces a requirement simply for existing.
I’m opposed to mandatory seat belts and mandatory jabs. Generally, I don’t like being told what to do even if it’s something I’m not opposed to.
The bigger issue...there is no constitutional right to drive a car. Driving a car is a privilege. Court cases out the butt on this issue. Because it isn’t a right, the state can regulate operation of a car. Driver’s licenses. Speed limits. Driver’s license restrictions for various issues. Wearing seatbelts. All conditions on the privilege to drive. But there is a constitutional right to as to what one puts in one’s body. There is a huge difference.
There should be no seatbelt mandate.
I strongly oppose mandatory seatbelt laws as well. Both are governmental overreach
To use the government’s Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System’s numbers to make your argument that vaccines are bad destroys all credibility.
Just because Wesley Smith twists the logic about seat belts in the “National Review,” does not make it correct. The analogy is, just like the seat belt protects you from death, so does the vaccine.
Your chance of dying in a car accident are even more remote than dying from COVID-19; yet there is a mandate for seat belts. That’s another part of the analogy, since dying from COVID is in the 2% range.
The side-effects from the vaccine are even more remote than dying from COVID-19. Yet, people act like those side effects are mountains when they are actually mole holes.
Finally, isn’t the “my body, my choice” argument being used to kill babies in the womb? Do you support that?