The judges would claim to have used the best remedy available. They bar certain individuals from the various intelligence services from appearing before the court.
That’s called accountability.
The judges are invested in their own version of “integrity.” This involves not facing reality, but instead confining the thought process to what they want to see, excluding material that would “harm integrity.”
The whole thing is a sham erected for the purpose of misleading the public.
They make good money doing it too.
I think we’re on the same page about them. However, so far, I have not heard that they’ve even claimed to have acted on these crimes.
I am disgusted, but not surprised, that the one judge replied to Levin with a lie. In a legal document no less.